The very recent Singapore High Court descision in Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG  SGHC 220 (HC) ("Go Dante Yap") concerned a claim by the plaintiff customer against the defendant privatye bank for losses sufferd in respect of certain investments made by the plaintiff through the defendant.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact email@example.comRegister
The Singapore High Court’s most recent statement on the law relating to a private bank’s contractual and/or tortious duty to give investment advice
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Related topic hubs
"I am a frequent reader of Lexology as it is an efficient and concise service. It is very relevant as a large part of these communications come from law firms, who have a clear interest in marketing their organizations expertise in key areas of business law"