The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that a customary “reservation of rights” clause in a patent license is not sufficient to reserve “have made” rights under a patent license. CoreBrace LLC v. Star Seismic LLC,No. 2008-1502 (Fed. Cir.May 22, 2009).
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com
RegisterA general “reservation of rights” clause does not reserve “have made” rights under a patent license
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
USA
June 4 2009
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.
Related topic hubs
Audrey E Mross
Labor & Employment Attorney
Munck Carter LLP
What our clients say
“The Lexology newsfeed is very relevant to my practice and I like that you can tailor the newsfeed to include specific practice areas. I enjoy seeing a variety of approaches and I will read multiple articles on the same topic for the purpose of getting the fullest understanding of a new law, a court case or other legal development.”
