Judges: Rader, Lourie (author), Prost
[Appealed from W.D. Tex., Judge Sparks]
In Western Union Co. v. MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., Nos. 10-1080, -1210 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2010), the Federal Circuit reversed the jury’s determination that the patents-in-suit were not invalid for obviousness. The Court also reversed the district court’s denial of MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.’s (“MoneyGram”) renewed motion for JMOL on obviousness, infringement, and invalidity.