• Coverage: where insured contracted to purchase all land owned by seller in a particular county and seller had previously conveyed a disputed parcel such that the contract did not included the disputed parcel, insured did not have a claim under title insurance policy despite the fact that policy erroneously described the disputed parcel Knispel v. Transnation Title Ins. Co., Case No. 223870 (Cal. App. Oct. 30, 2012) (reversing judgment)
  • Class Action: plaintiffs alleging claims for money had and received, unjust enrichment, breach of implied contract, and violation of state statute based on alleged collection of excessive premiums were not parties to lender’s policy and, thus, were not bound by arbitration provision Lang v. First American Title Ins. Co., 2-CV-266S (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 22, 2012) (order denying motion to stay and compel arbitration)