ABSTRACT
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court’s analysis of a dilution-by-blurring action relating to the stitched design on jean pockets was faulty because it used an outdated test to compare the parties’ marks.
Review your content's performance and reach.
Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.
Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.
Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.
Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.
Register
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
ABSTRACT
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court’s analysis of a dilution-by-blurring action relating to the stitched design on jean pockets was faulty because it used an outdated test to compare the parties’ marks.
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].