On August 13, 2015, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published for comment proposed amendments to National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions and its Companion Policy. The proposed amendments seek to harmonize the form of report for prospectus exempt distributions across Canada, while increasing the disclosure requirements.

The market for securities distributed under exemptions from the prospectus requirement—known as the “exempt market”— has been the subject of increased regulatory focus since the 2007-2008 financial crisis. The proposed amendments are the latest in a series of proposed or enacted reforms in this area,[i] and they supersede changes to exempt market reporting proposed by provincial securities regulators in February and March of 2014.

The CSA is accepting comments on the proposed amendments until October 13, 2015. If you have any questions about the proposed amendments, or require support to submit a comment, please contact one of our securities lawyers.

Background and comparison

Currently, issuers and underwriters are required to file a report on Form 45-106F1 following an exempt distribution in any Canadian jurisdiction other than British Columbia.  Since 2011, British Columbia has required reporting of exempt distributions on its own, more comprehensive, Form 45-106F6. Under the proposed amendments there would once again be a single, national form of report (the Proposed Form), which would replace Form 45-106F1, and Form 45-106F6 would be rescinded.

For a tabular comparison of the requirements of Form 45-106F1, Form 45-106F6 and the Proposed Form, please click here.

Proposed reporting requirements

As described below, the proposed amendments increase the amount of information that must be disclosed about the issuer, certain individuals related to the issuer, and investors. The increase is significant relative to the current Form 45-106F1, and less so relative to Form 45-106F6.

The main question being asked by the CSA is whether the Proposed Form strikes the appropriate balance between the benefits associated with greater public information and the associated cost and burden on issuers.

Other than as noted below, the information reported would be accessible to the public. For information that is to be reported confidentially, freedom of information legislation may require regulators to make the information available under certain conditions if requested.

Identifying numbers for issuers, underwriters and securities being distributed. The Proposed Form would require disclosure of certain identifying numbers, as follows:

Summary details of non-SEDAR filers. The following would have to be disclosed by issuers that do not file continuous disclosure documents on SEDAR: date of formation, financial year-end, value of assets and, if applicable, jurisdictions where reporting and stock exchange listings. This would apply primarily to private Canadian companies, and public and private non-Canadian companies.

Number of employees. The Proposed Form would require disclosure of the number of employees of the issuer, expressed as one of four listed ranges varying from below 50 to 500 or more.

Key individuals related to certain non-public issuers. The Proposed Form includes significant disclosure requirements for key individuals in respect of most non-public issuers. This is similar to a requirement of the current Form 45-106F6, but is new to all jurisdictions other than British Columbia. Specifically, these new rules apply to any issuer that is neither: (i) a reporting issuer in Canada; (ii) a “foreign public issuer”;[ii] nor (iii) only distributing “eligible foreign securities” to “permitted clients”[iii]
in Canada.

The following disclosure would be required by the applicable non-public issuers. This will likely be the most contentious aspect of the proposed amendments, particularly for large shareholders who expect to keep their holdings confidential for business or strategic reasons.

  • For directors, executive officers, control persons and promoters:
    • Names, jurisdiction of residence, relationship to the issuer, number of voting securities and the amount paid for such securities would be made publicly available. Where a control person or promoter of an applicable non-public issuer is a company, the Proposed Form would also require public disclosure of the name and jurisdiction of residence of the company’s directors and executive officers.
    • Residential addresses would be reported confidentially to the applicable securities commission(s).
  • The CEO’s email address would be reported confidentially.

Details of certain prospectus exemptions, by investor. The Proposed Form requires additional information about investors subscribing under the “accredited investor”, “family, friends and business associates” and “offering memorandum” exemptions. In each case the applicable criterion of the exemption that the investor satisfies would be specified, whereas currently only the applicable exemption must be disclosed. As with other details of each purchaser, the information is to be reported confidentially. If an investor satisfies multiple exemptions or categories, only one need be identified.

  • For a person investing under the “family, friends and business associates” exemption, the Proposed Form would require the name and position of the individual at the issuer with whom the investor has a relationship.
  • For accredited investors, the Proposed Form would require disclosure of the applicable category of the definition under which the investor qualifies. In many cases this will involve specifying whether an individual satisfies the income, net assets or financial assets test, as set out in National Instrument 45-106.
  • For an investor qualifying under the offering memorandum exemption as an “eligible investor”, the applicable category must be specified. This applies only in Alberta, Manitoba, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan and the territories.

This is a new reporting requirement, but it should not impose a significant burden on issuers. It is consistent with recent changes to National Instrument 45-106 and its Companion Policy requiring issuers to gather additional information about investors participating under these exemptions.

Other information about each investor. The Proposed Form would require a statement as to whether each investor is a registrant and/or an insider of the issuer, to be reported confidentially. This is a current requirement of Form 45-106F6.

The existing forms of report and the Proposed Report require disclosure of all investors, not just those in the jurisdiction where the report is being filed. An exception exists for non-Canadian issuers, which only must disclose information about Canadian investors.

Notably, under Form 45-106F6 certain information about each investor—including the name and the amount being invested—is made publicly available. This would not be the case under the Proposed Form.

Information about persons being compensated. As under the current forms, the identity of persons being compensated in connection with the distribution, and the details of such compensation, would be made publicly available. The Proposed Form would also require disclosure of the relationship between any person being compensated and the issuer and, confidentially, the relationship between any person being compensated and each purchaser associated with that person.

Offering materials. For an exempt distribution in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec or Saskatchewan, the Proposed Form mandates a listing of all offering materials (such as offering memoranda) that are required to be filed with the applicable regulator in connection with the distribution. There is no new filing requirement in respect of such materials; the Proposed Form only requires that they be listed.

Investment fund issuers. Issuers that are investment funds would have the following new reporting obligations under the Proposed Form: the type of fund, net asset value (expressed as a range), date of formation, financial year-end, reporting issuer status and net proceeds of the offering (being gross proceeds less redemptions). If applicable, investment funds would also have to disclose CUSIP numbers and exchange listings. The proposed amendments provide that for distributions made in reliance on certain prospectus exemptions, reporting would be required by investment funds within 30 days after the calendar year-end, i.e. by January 30. The current deadline is 30 days after the investment fund's financial year-end.

Comparison of disclosure requirements

The following table compares the disclosure requirements of Form 45-106F1, Form 45-106F6 and the Proposed Form, to the extent of any significant differences. For a PDF version of the table, please click here.

Click here to view table.