Legal and regulatory framework
Laws and regulations
What are the relevant statutes and regulations governing securities offerings? Which regulatory authority is primarily responsible for the administration of those rules?
The legal framework governing the offering of securities on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (LuxSE) and their admission to trading on a regulated market is the result of a blend of national laws and European directives requirements. Until 21 July 2019, the offering of securities is primarily governed by the Law of 10 July 2005 relating to the prospectus for securities (the Prospectus Law), which implements Directive 2003/71/EC (the 2003 Prospectus Directive). The Prospectus Law was amended inter alia by the Luxembourg law of 3 July 2012 (the 2012 Law) implementing Directive 2010/73/EU (the 2010 Prospectus Directive) and by the Luxembourg law of 10 May 2016 implementing Directive 2013/50/EU.
The 2012 Law, beyond the strict implementation of the 2010 Prospectus Directive, further amended the Prospectus Law in respect of public offerings and the admission to trading on a regulated market of securities that are not subject to community harmonisation under the 2003 Prospectus Directive.
On 20 July 2017, the Regulation 2017/1129 (the Prospectus Regulation) repealing the 2003 Prospectus Directive entered into force. While only three provisions of the Prospectus Regulation apply as from 20 July 2017, a few others are applicable since 21 July 2018 and most of them will only apply as of 21 July 2019. As from this latter date, provisions of Prospectus Law that are stricter or vary from the Prospectus Regulation will no longer apply.
The main features of this new regulation include:
- creating a framework for simplified prospectuses for secondary issuances, small, medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and undertakings whose issuance does not exceed €20,000,000 over a period of 12 months;
- improving the conditions for frequent issuers by reducing application delays through the introduction of a universal registration document that must be submitted to the relevant authority; and
- limiting the description of risk factors to the significant ones specific to the investment.
The public offering of securities representing units issued by undertakings for collective investment other than the closed-end type are subject to the sole provisions of the Laws on Undertaking of Collective Investments dated 17 December 2010 as amended. Units of an open-end type are out of the scope of the Prospectus Law irrespective of the frequency and periodicity of their repurchase. The prospectus they issue is valid for an offer to the public or their admission on a regulated market.
The Prospectus Law distinguishes three different types of legal regimes for offerings and admission:
- First Regime: relating to the offering and admission on a regulated market of securities subject to European harmonisation under the 2003 Prospectus Directive as amended or, as applicable, the Prospectus Regulation (Part II of the Prospectus Law with a full prospectus regime).
- Second Regime: relating to the offering and admission to trading on a regulated market (as defined in the Prospectus Law) of securities not covered by the First Regime (Part III of the Prospectus Law with a simplified prospectus regime).
- Third Regime: relating to the admission of securities to trading on markets not listed as a regulated market as defined in the Prospectus Law (Part IV of the Prospectus Law). At present, there is only one such market in Luxembourg: the Euro Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) market.
The regulatory supervisory authority, the Commission for the Supervision of the Financial Sector (CSSF) has issued several administrative circulars that complete the body of existing rules and regulations, and that provide an overview and recommendations in respect of the Prospectus Law requirements. In respect of the Prospectus Regulation, the European Supervisory Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued a dedicated ‘questions and answers’ document and technical guidelines on the implementation of the Prospectus Regulation.
In addition to the Prospectus Law and the Prospectus Regulation, admission to trading on the LuxSE is subject to the Grand-Ducal Regulation of 13 July 2007 on the keeping of an official list (the Official List Regulation) and the LuxSE’s own rules and regulations (the LuxSE Rules and Regulations, and together with the Official List Regulation, the LuxSE Listing Rules). The LuxSE Listing Rules set out the requirements for admission to a Luxembourg-regulated market and regulate the conduct of listed companies.
Specific regulations also apply to public offerings pursuant to public takeover bids (ie, the Law of 19 May 2006, as amended, implementing European Directive 2004/25/EC).
The CSSF is the authority primarily responsible for the supervision and enforcement of the statutes and regulations governing public offerings of securities in Luxembourg. In particular the CSSF is responsible for approving prospectuses under the regime covered by the 2003 Prospectus Directive as amended or, as from 21 July 2019, the Prospectus Regulation (First Regime) and the simplified prospectuses relating to securities that are outside the scope of the First Regime. The CSSF regularly issues and promulgates instructions and guidelines under the form of administrative circulars that implement these statutes and regulations. Further to the creation of the ESMA, the CSSF cooperates with the ESMA, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulation 1095/2010 in matters of exchange of information and proceeds to the necessary reporting to enable the ESMA to carry out its mission.
The LuxSE is the sole institution authorised to administer one or several securities markets situated or operating in the Luxembourg market. It has the residuary competence for approving offers of securities admitted to trading under the Second Regime, namely, that are not covered by the Community harmonisation for the offering of securities and admitted to trading on the LuxSE or the Euro MTF (the Luxembourg alternative regulated market). The LuxSE has been operating the Euro MTF since 18 July 2005. This second market, which is not included in the list of regulated markets of the European Commission, is an alternative for issuers that wish to benefit from a certain regulatory framework, but do not require a European passport for prospectuses.
The LuxSE is responsible for administering and enforcing the LuxSE Listing Rules as well as approving the admission of an entity to the official list and the quotation of the entity’s securities on the LuxSE.
What regulatory or stock exchange filings must be made in connection with a public offering of securities? What information must be included in such filings or made available to potential investors?
Pursuant to the Prospectus Law and, as applicable, the Prospectus Regulation, any issuer intending to make an offer of securities to the public or an admission to trading of securities (equity or debt) on a regulated market situated or operated within the territory of Luxembourg must, subject to certain exemptions listed in the Prospectus Law or, as applicable, the Prospectus Regulation, publish a prospectus. The issuer must notify the competent authorities (the CSSF or the LuxSE) of that intention in advance. An ‘offer of securities’ to the public is a communication to persons in any form and by any means, presenting sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be offered, so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe to these securities. Securities include shares in companies and their equivalent, but also bonds or other forms of securitised debt, depositary receipt in respect of such securities and other securities giving the rights to sell or acquire any such transferable securities or giving rise to a cash settlement determined by reference to transferable securities, currencies, interest rates or yields, commodities or other indices or measures.
According to the Prospectus Law, certain types of offers are exempt from the obligation to publish a prospectus, and consequently the obligation to notify the CSSF or the LuxSE. These are offers of securities:
- addressed solely to qualified investors;
- addressed to fewer than 150 natural or legal persons other than qualified investors, per member state;
- addressed to investors who acquire securities for a total consideration of at least €100,000 per investor, for each separate offer; and
- whose denomination per unit amounts to at least €100,000.
Qualified investors are defined by article 2 of the Prospectus Law in a consistent manner with the definition of professional clients for purpose of the Directive 2014/65/EU (the MiFID II Directive), a similar approach has been adopted under the Prospectus Regulation. Qualified investors are the professional clients listed under category I of Annex II of the MiFID II Directive, including those persons or entities who may be treated as professional clients on request, in compliance with Annex II of the MiFID II Directive, or who are recognised as an eligible counterparty pursuant to article 30 of this directive, unless they have opted to be treated as non-professionals.
In addition, the offering of certain types of securities are exempt from the obligation to publish a prospectus. These types of securities are the following:
- shares issued in substitution for shares of the same class already issued, if the issuing of such new shares does not involve any increase in the issued capital;
- securities offered in connection with a takeover by means of an exchange offer, provided that a document is available containing information that is regarded by the CSSF as being equivalent to that of the prospectus, taking into account the requirements of Community legislation on exchange offers;
- securities offered, allotted or to be allotted in connection with a merger, provided that a document is available containing information that is regarded by the regulatory authority as being equivalent to that of the prospectus, taking into account the requirements of Community legislation on mergers;
- shares offered, allotted or to be allotted free of charge to existing shareholders, and dividends paid out in the form of shares of the same class as the shares in respect of which such dividends are paid, provided that a document is made available containing information on the number and nature of the shares and the reasons for and details of the offer;
- securities offered, allotted or to be allotted to existing or former directors or employees by their employer whose securities are already admitted to trading on a regulated market or by an affiliated undertaking, provided that a document is made available containing information on the number and nature of the securities and the reasons for and details of the offer;
- dividends paid out to existing shareholders in the form of shares of the same class as the shares in respect of which such dividends are paid, provided that a document is made available containing information on the number and nature of the shares and the reasons for and details of the offer; this obligation applies also to a company established outside the European Union whose securities are admitted to trading either on a regulated market or on a third-country market. In the latter case, the exemption applies provided that adequate information, including the document referred thereto, is available at least in a language customary in the sphere of international finance and provided that the European Commission has adopted an equivalence decision regarding the third-country market concerned; and
- securities offered, allotted or to be allotted to existing or former directors or employees by their employer or by an affiliated undertaking provided that the company has its head office or registered office in the European Union and provided that a document is made available containing information on the number and nature of the securities and the reasons for and details of the offer.
As from 21 July 2019, the Prospectus Regulation will amend the above list and provide for more flexibility to benefit from the above exemptions. In particular:
- In respect of the exemptions relating to securities offered in connection with a takeover, and securities offered in connection with a merger, the document required to be exempted from the obligation to prepare a prospectus will only need to set out the respective transactions and their impacts on the relevant issuer.
- An additional exemption is laid down for non-equity securities issued in a continuous or repeated manner by a credit institution, where the total aggregated consideration in the EU for the securities offered is less than €75 million per credit institution calculated over a period of 12 months, provided that those securities: (i) are not subordinated, convertible or exchangeable; and (ii) do not give a right to subscribe for or acquire other types of securities and are not linked to a derivative instrument.
As regards information to be disclosed in prospectuses before 21 July 2019, the Prospectus Law refers explicitly to the Annexes of the Commission Regulation (EC) 809/2004/EC (the Regulation on the information to be contained in the Prospectus), which deal with the level of information required to be disclosed, depending on the prescribed category of issuer and the type of securities to be offered. In general, the prospectus must currently contain all information necessary for investors to make an informed assessment of the assets and liabilities, financial position, profits and losses, and future prospects of the issuer and of any guarantor of the securities to be listed, as well as the rights attaching to such securities and any conditions under which they are issued. In particular, the prospectus should include disclosures of applicable risk factors, business and market descriptions, the financial statements of the issuer and a management discussion and analysis (MD&A) section. The prospectus must also include a summary section (key information), which conveys, in plain language, appropriate information relating to the securities offered, including risks associated with the issuer, any guarantor and the securities in order to aid investors when considering whether to invest in such securities. This summary must be drawn up in a common format, in order to facilitate comparability of the summaries of similar securities. This summary is not required for non-equity securities having a denomination of at least €100,000.
As of the full application of the Prospectus Regulation, prospectuses regulated by the First Regime will have to contain the necessary information that is material to an investor for making an informed assessment of:
- the assets and liabilities, profits and losses, financial position, and prospects of the issuer and of any guarantor;
- the rights attaching to the securities; and
- the reasons for the issuance and its impact on the issuer.
The issuer may decide to issue the prospectus as a single document or as separate documents. A prospectus composed of separate documents must split the required information into a registration document, a securities note and a summary note. The registration document contains the information relating to the issuer. The securities note contains the information concerning the securities offered to the public or to be admitted to trading on a regulated market.
Issuers who offer securities under the Second Regime are only required to publish a simplified prospectus. The compulsory content of the simplified prospectus is listed in Annexes I and III to VI of the LuxSE Rules and Regulations depending on the nature of the securities listed. Alternatively, reference may be made to the Annexes of the Regulation on the information to be contained in the Prospectus.
Issuers who offer securities intended to be traded on the LuxSE under the Second Regime are required to publish a prospectus, which must be approved by the LuxSE. The compulsory content of the simplified prospectus is listed under Part III of the Prospectus Law and in sub--chapter 1 of Chapter I of Part 2 of the LuxSE Rules and Regulations.
Issuers who offer securities on the Euro MTF under the Third Regime are required to file a prospectus with the LuxSE in accordance with the requirements laid down under sub-chapter 2 of Chapter I of Part 2 of the LuxSE Rules and Regulations.
Prospectuses can be drafted in Luxemburgish, French, German or English and other languages deemed acceptable by the CSSF or the LuxSE. Once approved the prospectus must be filed with the CSSF by email or through the CSSF secured internet platform (www.e-file.lu). Every significant new fact, material mistake or inaccuracy relating to the information included in the prospectus, which is capable of affecting the assessment of the securities and that arises or is noted between the time when the prospectus is approved and the final closing of the offer to the public or, as the case may be, the time when trading on a regulated market begins, must be mentioned in a supplement to the prospectus. Such a supplement must be approved in the same way within a maximum of seven working days (such delay being reduced to five working day as of 21 July 2019 as per the Prospectus Regulation) and published in accordance with at least the same arrangements as were applied when the original prospectus was published.
To the extent the securities offered to the public are also intended to be listed on the LuxSE, an additional request for being admitted to the LuxSE must be filed with the LuxSE. An application for admission to trading in securities on one of the securities markets operated by the LuxSE is also deemed to be an application for admission to the official list. Therefore, an application for admission to the official list without an application for admission to trading on one of the securities markets operated by the LuxSE will not be accepted. The decision of listing for any equity, debt or derivative issuance programme is effective for one year and may be renewed annually in order to allow new listings.
Review of filings
What are the steps of the registration and filing process? May an offering commence while regulatory review is in progress? How long does it typically take for the review process to be completed?
According to the Prospectus Law, no offer of securities can be made to the public within the territory of Luxembourg without prior publication of a prospectus approved by the CSSF or the LuxSE.
To the extent that no prospectus may be published unless it has been approved beforehand by the CSSF or, as applicable, the LuxSE, the public offering process is therefore a two-step process that entails first the approval of the prospectus, and second its publication.
This approval, however, does not guarantee the economic and financial soundness of the offering or listing, nor the quality or solvency of the issuer. The authorities require that a specific disclaimer be inserted in the prospectus in this respect. The draft prospectus is initially submitted for review purposes to such relevant authorities. They have 10 working days to notify their decision to approve the prospectus if the issuer already has securities admitted to trading on a regulated market and has previously offered securities to the public. This time limit is extended to 20 working days if the securities are offered by an issuer who has not issued securities admitting to trading on a regulated market and has not previously offered securities to the public. The time limit runs from the working day following that of the official submission.
If, at the time of the receipt or processing of the submitted file, the file is not complete or additional information is needed, the issuer will be advised that the file is incomplete, and the time limit then starts to run only from the working day following that on which the requested information has been provided by the issuer in accordance with the provisions of the Prospectus Law. The CSSF has 10 working days from the submission date to notify the issuer that the file is incomplete or that supplementary information is needed.
The authorities may still validly notify their approval after the expiry of the above-mentioned time limit. In particular, this enables the issuer to ask the CSSF to approve the prospectus on a date that, owing to the timetable of the transaction, falls beyond the prescribed time limits provided in the Prospectus Law as regards the notification of the decision of approval. The same principles apply to applications for approval of supplements to the prospectus within the time limit for approval of seven days.
It should be noted that prior to the official submission, the issuer must notify its intent to proceed to the public offering or the listing of securities on the LuxSE. It would also be well advised to solicit from the relevant authorities their preliminary view, in particular when the contemplated offering or listing is unusually complex. Communication with the CSSF or the LuxSE is easy and straightforward, and is usually made by electronic communication.
Issuers intending to list their securities on the LuxSE must also file a request form for the admission of securities to trading and a letter of undertaking whereby they commit to maintain their entity in good standing, comply with applicable regulations and report adequately to the authorities as needed.
Once approved and submitted to the CSSF or the LuxSE, the prospectus must be made available to the public by the issuer, offeror or person asking for admission to trading on a regulated market as soon as is practicable or at a reasonable time before, and at the latest, at the beginning of, the offer to the public or the admission to trading of the securities involved. In addition, in the case of an initial public offering of a class of shares not already admitted to trading on a regulated market that is to be admitted to trading for the first time, the prospectus shall be available at least six working days before the end of the offer.
Similar principles are provided for under the Prospectus Regulation and will fully apply as from 21 July 2019.
The Prospectus Law provides that the prospectus is deemed available to the public when published:
- by insertion in one or more newspapers circulated throughout, or widely circulated in, Luxembourg;
- in printed form made available to the public, free of charge, at the offices of the LuxSE, or at the registered office of the issuer and at the offices of the financial intermediaries placing or selling the securities, including paying agents;
- in electronic form on the issuer’s website and, if applicable, on the website of the financial intermediaries placing or selling the securities, including those agents in charge of the financial service;
- in electronic form on the website of the LuxSE; or
- in electronic form on the website of the CSSF.
The Prospectus Regulation provides that as from 21 July 2019, the Prospectus will only be deemed available when published:
- on the website of the issuer, the offeror or the person asking for admission to trading on a regulated market;
- on the website of the financial intermediaries placing or selling the securities, including paying agents; or
- on the website of the regulated market where the admission to trading is sought, or where no admission to trading on a regulated market is sought, the website of the operator of the MTF.
The Prospectus Law does not require, as proposed by the 2010 Prospectus Directive, publication of a notice stating that the prospectus has been made available and where it can be obtained. It is noteworthy that prospectuses are published by the CSSF on the website of the LuxSE for a period of at least 12 months, and this is sufficient to fulfil the obligation to publish imposed on the issuer. The Prospectus Regulation, contrary to the 2010 Prospectus Directive does not require the publication of any such notice either.
What publicity restrictions apply to a public offering of securities? Are there any restrictions on the ability of the underwriters to issue research reports?
Any advertisements must state that a prospectus has been or will be published and indicate where investors are or will be able to obtain it. The mention of the decision of approval of the prospectus by the Commission does not constitute an appreciation of the opportuneness of the transaction proposed to investors.
Advertisements must be clearly recognisable as such and the information contained therein must not be inaccurate or misleading. They also must be consistent with the information contained in the prospectus, if already published, or with the information required to be in the prospectus, if the prospectus is published afterwards. All information concerning the offer to the public or the admission to trading on the LuxSE disclosed in oral or written form, even if not for advertising purposes, must always be consistent with that contained in the prospectus.
The CSSF has the power to exercise control over the compliance of advertising activity, relating to a public offer of securities within the territory of Luxembourg or an admission of securities to trading on the LuxSE. The provisions of the Prospectus Law do not provide for the prior communication and formal approval of advertisements. However, the issuer may submit their draft advertisement to the CSSF via email with the view to obtaining a CSSF opinion as to their compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The Prospectus Regulation does not deviate from the principles laid down by the Prospectus Law in this respect.
The preparation and distribution of research reports should be made in accordance with the provisions of Luxembourg law, in particular the Law of 23 December 2016 (the Market Abuse Law), implementing Regulation 596/2014 (the Market Abuse Regulation) and transposing Directive 2014/57/EU (the Market Abuse Directive and together with the Market Abuse Law and the Market Abuse Regulation, the Market Abuse Legal Framework) and Commission Directive 2015/2392/EU.
Under the new European market abuse legislation, the Market Abuse Regulation and the Market Abuse Directive are the basis of the legal framework. The Market Abuse Directive, the Market Abuse Regulation and the Market Abuse Law aim to improve financial market integrity and investors’ protection by updating and strengthening the current system for combating market abuse, including new markets and new trading strategies in its scope of application, and introducing new powers for the CSSF and additional obligations for the issuer.
According to the Market Abuse Legal Framework, persons who produce or disseminate investment recommendations in Luxembourg or who, from abroad, specifically target the Luxembourg public, must specifically ensure that the recommendations are presented fairly, that they clearly mention conflicts of interests and that they include all the other references provided for by the Market Abuse Law and the Market Abuse Regulation.
In transposing the Market Abuse Directive, the Market Abuse Law imposes criminal sanctions in respect of the following four offences:
- insider dealing, which is defined as a person holding inside information to use that information to acquire or dispose of financial instruments to which that information relates;
- recommending or inducing another person to engage in insider dealing, which is described under the Market Abuse Law as the recommending or inducing of another person to engage in insider dealing;
- unlawful disclosure of inside information, which arises where a person possesses inside information and discloses that information to any other person, except when the disclosure is made in the normal exercise of employment, a profession or duties; and
- market manipulation, which not only encompasses the entering into of a transaction or the placement of an order to trade but also includes any other behaviour that, among other things, gives false or misleading signals as to the supply of, demand for, or price of a financial instrument or a related spot commodity contract; or transmits false or misleading information or provides false or misleading inputs or any other behaviour that manipulates the calculation of a benchmark.
Are there any special rules that differentiate between primary and secondary offerings? What are the liability issues for the seller of securities in a secondary offering?
Secondary offerings of securities through a public offering are subject to the same requirements as primary offerings. However, a secondary offering can be exempted from the prospectus obligations inasmuch as the obligations do not apply to the admission to trading on a regulated market of shares representing, over a period of 12 months, less than 10 per cent of the number of shares of the same class already admitted to trading on the same regulated market. As from 21 July 2019, the Prospectus Regulation will raise the limit for such exemption to 20 per cent of the number of shares of the same class already admitted to trading on the same regulated market.
Any subsequent resale of securities is to be regarded as a separate offer, and the conditions of the Prospectus Law, or as applicable, the Prospectus Regulation apply for the purposes of deciding whether or not that resale is an offer to the public. In this respect, the placement of securities through financial intermediaries remains subject to publication of a prospectus if none of the exemption conditions for a public offering are met for the final placement.
A primary offering of shares or equity-linked securities, namely, warrants, and securities convertible into shares of a Luxembourg company wholly for cash, requires that such securities be first offered to the existing shareholders on a pro rata basis, unless the statutory pre-emption right is disapplied. The statutory pre-emption right may be disapplied by resolution of the shareholders resolving in a duly convened meeting of shareholders or by the board of directors if such a power has been granted to them by the shareholders pursuant to the authorisation granted to the board to issue equity and equity-linked securities (authorised capital).
Pre-emption rights can be restricted to certain classes of shares in the articles of incorporation of the Luxembourg company.
What is the typical settlement process for sales of securities in a public offering?
The LuxSE relies on the following clearing and settlement entities: LCH Clearnet SA, Clearstream Banking SA or Euroclear Bank SA.
Generally, the settlement-delivery of securities occurs on the third trading day following the end of their placement. Upon issue, the securities are registered in the books of the settlement entities, which will credit the accounts of the financial intermediaries on the settlement-delivery date.
Are there specific rules for the private placing of securities? What procedures must be implemented to effect a valid private placing?
Private placements of securities made under the circumstances described under article 5(2) of the Prospectus Law or, as applicable, article 1(4) of the Prospectus Regulation fall outside the scope of public offerings and, accordingly, are exempted from the obligation to publish a prospectus. See question 2 for a list of offers that are exempt from the obligation to publish a prospectus. There are no specific rules governing the private placing of securities. However, general principles of laws would apply and issuers should endeavour to deliver accurate and non-misleading information on the securities issuance and the private placing process. Their liability could be involved on grounds of general principles of contractual and civil law or liability in tort (see questions 8 and 19).
What information must be made available to potential investors in connection with a private placing of securities?
There are no specific regulations or legal provisions governing private placement of securities.
General principles of law must, however, apply. This involves investors being treated equally and fairly and having access to the same information when subscribing to the securities. Article 17 of the Prospectus Law sets out that when no prospectus is required, material information provided by an issuer or an offeror and addressed to qualified investors or special categories of investors, including information disclosed in the context of meetings relating to offers of securities, must be disclosed to all qualified investors or special categories of investors to whom the offer is exclusively addressed. Similar provisions are provided for under the Prospectus Regulation.
It is also advisable that the persons who carry out a private placement in Luxembourg inform potential investors that any prospectus relating to the offering of securities has not been submitted to the clearance procedures of the CSSF. They should also take the necessary measures to avoid the placement qualifying as a public offering and require the necessary undertaking from investors that they act for their own account and do not intend to resell the securities under the terms of a public offering. Finally, they should provide accurate and complete information in respect of the placed securities in order to enable the investors to make an informed assessment of the securities.
Transfer of placed securities
Do restrictions apply to the transferability of securities acquired in a private placing? And are any mechanisms used to enhance the liquidity of securities sold in a private placing?
There are no particular restrictions on the transferability of securities acquired in a private placement, except that any resale to the public of such securities must be made in accordance with the rules on public offerings (see question 1).
The Law of 6 April 2013 on dematerialised securities has modernised the Law of 1 August 2001 on the circulation of securities by creating a third category of securities alongside securities in bearer or registered form and introduces a general regime for them, thereby providing Luxembourg capital companies the option to issue shares in dematerialised form and for all other issuers to issue dematerialised debt securities governed by Luxembourg law. Generally, the law on dematerialised securities introduces a comprehensive and complete regime covering the issue, conversion, pledging, transmission and conditions required for the issue of dematerialised securities. The Luxembourg legislator took the opportunity to implement certain principles arising from the Unidroit Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities dated 9 October 2009. The law provides that the issuance of dematerialised securities (equity and debt) must be registered in an issue account held with one single securities settlement system or one single central account holder. The holding of dematerialised securities may be realised through a chain of holdings involving one or more intermediaries between the security settlement system or central account holder and the ultimate holders of the dematerialised securities. Transfer of dematerialised securities is effected by a book entry transfer between accounts. Payments by the issuer to a securities settlement system or central account holder discharge the issuer. The law offers some additional guarantees to the acquirers of securities against any earlier defective book entry and imposes the obligation for an intermediary to hold sufficient securities equal to the aggregate number of securities credited to the securities accounts maintained for its account holders and for itself.
What specific domestic rules apply to offerings of securities outside your jurisdiction made by an issuer domiciled in your jurisdiction?
Following the implementation of the 2010 Prospectus Directive, in order to carry out an offering of securities in another member state of the European Economic Area (EEA), a Luxembourg issuer must obtain the approval of the CSSF on the prospectus and make an application for the delivery of a certificate of approval to the ESMA and the competent authority of the EEA member state in which the public offering is contemplated. Within three trading days following such application (under the Prospectus Regulation such delay will be reduced to one trading day), or within one trading day after approval of the prospectus by the CSSF (if the application has been submitted at the same time on the first filing of the prospectus), the CSSF issues a certificate of approval to the competent authority of the other jurisdiction, specifying that the prospectus has been drawn up in accordance with the 2010 Prospectus Directive and is valid for any public offerings carried out in any member state of the EU. If needed, the said certificate shall enclose a translation of the summary produced under the responsibility of the issuer.
When an offer of securities is carried out in a jurisdiction other than Luxembourg and restricted to foreign subscribers, the Luxembourg issuer needs to comply only with the securities laws of such jurisdiction.
Offerings of other securities
What special considerations apply to offerings of exchangeable or convertible securities, warrants or depositary shares or rights offerings?
Offerings of exchangeable or convertible bonds, warrants, depositary shares or rights, fall within the scope of the 2010 Prospectus Directive, the Prospectus Law and the Prospectus Regulation. In this respect, the issuer or offeror must comply with the disclosure requirements contained in the relevant Annexes of the European Commission Regulation 809/2004/EC or, as applicable, the Prospectus Regulation and therefore must follow the process described further in question 2.
Under the LuxSE Rules and Regulations, convertible bonds, exchangeable bonds and bonds with warrants may only be admitted to the official list if the shares or units to which they relate have previously been admitted to this list or admitted to trading to another market, that operates in a legitimate, recognised and open manner, or are admitted at the same time.
By derogation these securities may, however, be admitted to the official list provided that the LuxSE is satisfied that the holders of the bonds have at their disposal all the necessary information to form an opinion concerning the value of the shares or units related to such bonds.
Types of arrangement
What types of underwriting arrangements are commonly used?
No standard form of underwriting agreement or guidelines exist that are provided by the Luxembourg financial authorities or professional bodies.
Underwriting agreements in the Luxembourg market usually comply with the prevailing international practice in equity or debt offerings, in particular with the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) standards. The LuxSE is an associate member of the ICMA. Underwriting agreements are several rather than joint-and-several.
What does the underwriting agreement typically provide with respect to indemnity, force majeure clauses, success fees and overallotment options?
Underwriting agreements for Luxembourg equity securities offerings usually contain an indemnity clause, for the purpose of indemnifying and protecting the underwriters and their directors, officers and employees, or controlled interests against any loss or damages resulting from untrue or misleading statements of material fact or material omissions contained in the prospectus, or any breach of the representations, warranties and agreements contained in the underwriting agreement. Underwriting agreements for debt securities also feature very similar indemnity clauses. Greenshoe shareholders can also agree to indemnify the underwriter under certain circumstances. This indemnity obligation is normally guaranteed by the assignment for security purposes of the proceeds of the offering.
Force majeure clauses in equity underwriting agreements generally cover any event that could affect financial markets, such as any change in general economic conditions or currency exchange, any suspension or material limitation in trading in securities on the main stock exchanges and other events that could prevent or have an adverse effect on the success of the offering. Debt underwriting agreements follow the ICMA’s rules and recommendations relating to force majeure.
Underwriting agreements relating to equity offerings frequently provide for incentive and success fees, which are paid at the issuer’s discretion. Incentive fees apply to the gross proceeds of the offering while success fees are paid if a certain threshold of gross proceeds is reached.
It is market practice for equity securities offerings to have underwriting agreements providing for an overallotment option in connection with the 30-day stabilisation activities that underwriters may perform during the stabilisation period following the listing of the shares. In accordance with the provisions of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052 of 8 March 2016 supplementing the Market Abuse Regulation (the Stabilisation Regulation), any stabilisation action usually ends no later than 30 days after the issue date of the relevant securities, in the case of a significant distribution in the form of an initial offer publicly announced, or 30 days after the date of the allotment, in the case of a significant distribution in the form of a secondary offer.
This overallotment option is typically granted by the company on newly issued shares or by the selling shareholders on existing shares. Article 3(3) of the Stabilisation Regulation restricts the extent of overallotment, such that issuers shall not, when executing transactions under a buy-back programme, purchase on any trading day more than 25 per cent of the average daily volume of the shares on the trading venue on which the purchase is carried out.
What additional regulations apply to underwriting arrangements?
There are no specific Luxembourg regulations applying to underwriting arrangements. The provisions of the Stabilisation Regulation apply directly to underwriting agreements in the Luxembourg territory. This regulation restricts the time-related conditions for stabilisation and sets the limit for, among other things, overallotment of securities and greenshoe options (not exceeding 15 per cent of the original offer).
Ongoing reporting obligations
Applicability of the obligation
In which instances does an issuer of securities become subject to ongoing reporting obligations?
Any issuer whose securities (equity or debt) are admitted to trading on the LuxSE is subject to ongoing reporting obligations (see question 16) according to the LuxSE Rules and Regulations, the Luxembourg Law of 11 January 2008 relating to the transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market as amended (the Transparency Law) and the Grand Ducal Regulation dated 11 January 2008 on transparency requirements of issuers of securities as amended (the Transparency Regulation).
The Transparency Law applies to issuers of securities for whom Luxembourg is the home member state. The Transparency Law does not apply to securities issued by collective investment undertakings other than the closed-end type, or to securities acquired or disposed of in such collective investment undertakings.
Issuers admitted to the Euro MTF market are not subject to the Transparency Law and Transparency Regulation but are subject to the reporting requirements set out by the LuxSE Rules and Regulations.
Shareholders, acting alone or in concert, of an issuer acquiring 95 per cent of the issuer capital and its voting rights must notify the CSSF when they reach this limit or cease to reach it. This notification is required in order to trigger the compulsory withdrawal or redemption of the securities held by other shareholders as per the Luxembourg Law of 21 July 2012 on mandatory squeeze-out and sell-out of securities of companies currently admitted or previously admitted to trading on a regulated market or having been offered to the public.
Information to be disclosed
What information is a reporting company required to make available to the public?
Annual financial reports
Issuers for whom Luxembourg is their home member state must make public their annual financial reports, at the latest, four months after the end of each financial year and must ensure that they remain publicly available for at least 10 years. These annual financial reports must comprise the audited financial statements, and the management report and management statements confirming that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards. The reports must give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the issuer, and describe the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
Where the issuer is required to prepare consolidated accounts according to Directive 2013/34/EU, the audited financial statements shall comprise such consolidated accounts drawn up in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002 and the annual accounts of the parent company drawn up in accordance with the national law of the member state in which the parent company is incorporated.
Half-yearly financial reports
Issuers of shares or debt securities for whom Luxembourg is their home member state must also make public a half-yearly financial report covering the first six months of the financial year as soon as possible after the end of the relevant period, but at the latest, three months thereafter. The issuers must ensure that the half-yearly financial report remains available to the public for at least 10 years. The half-yearly financial report shall comprise: the condensed set of financial statements for the relevant period; an interim management report; and management statements confirming that the condensed set of financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the issuer, or the undertakings included in the consolidation as a whole similarly to the annual financial reports mentioned above, and that the interim management report includes a fair review of the information provided under any consolidated accounts.
Issuers whose home member state for Transparency Law purposes is Luxembourg must disclose the regulated information through a specialised company and store it with the LuxSE through the central storage of regulated information (Officially Appointed Mechanism).
Several exemptions are provided by the Transparency Law such as for certain sovereign issuers and issuers of debt securities with a denomination per unit of at least €100,000.
The Transparency Law also requires certain notifications regarding the acquisition or disposal of major holdings. These requirements apply to the direct or indirect shareholders who acquire or dispose of shares who must notify the issuer of the proportion of voting rights held as a result of the acquisition or disposal where that proportion reaches, exceeds or falls below the thresholds of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 33.3, 50 and 66.6 per cent. Notifications are also required in the case of specific circumstances of major proportions of voting rights.
The Euro MTF market does not come under the scope of the European Union Directives and the Transparency Law. Issuers whose securities are admitted to the Euro MTF market are only subject to the specific publication requirements of the LuxSE Rules and Regulations. Reporting obligations on the Euro MTF are less stringent than those required by the Transparency Law. Issuers on the Euro MTF must disseminate the following information:
- information or events or decisions affecting the security holders;
- information on material changes to the issuer’s shareholders structures;
- audited annual financial statements and management reports, prepared in accordance with the issuer’s national law; and
- semi-annual financial statements to be published within four months of the issuer’s half year and comprising information on revenues and profit or loss for the period together with a commentary on any material factor having had an effect on the financial or trading position of the issuer during this period.
Issuers of debt securities with a denomination per unit of at least €50,000 are exempted from the publication of annual financial reports and half-yearly financial reports.
The Luxembourg Law of 10 May 2016 (the Amending Transparency Law) transposing the Directive 2013/50/EU (the Amending Transparency Directive) increased the CSSF powers to ensure that the provisions of the Transparency Law are complied with. Hence, the CSSF now has the power, in case of non-compliance with the Transparency Law, to order an issuer or holder of shares or other financial instruments: that regulated information be republished or re-notified; that a corrected version of the regulated information be published or notified; or that the correction of modification be made in the publication or notification of subsequent regulated information. More generally, the Amending Transparency Law clarifies that the CSSF has the power to enjoin issuers and holders of shares and other financial instruments to comply with the Transparency Law, to cease the conduct in breach of such law and to direct the withdrawal of securities from trading in case of breach of the Transparency Law.
In the case of a takeover bid of a Luxembourg company’s securities or securities admitted to trading on the LuxSE, the Law of 19 May 2006 implementing Directive 2004/25/EC on takeover bids will apply and impose disclosure requirements of specific information on the issuer.
Every issuer whose securities are admitted to trading on a securities market of the LuxSE must ensure the provision in Luxembourg of equivalent information to that made available to the market of any other stock exchange or stock exchanges situated or operating outside the member states of the European Union, to the extent that this information may be important for evaluating the securities in question.
What are the main rules prohibiting manipulative practices in securities offerings and secondary market transactions?
The Market Abuse Legal Framework aims at combating insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) in order to ensure the integrity of financial markets and enhance investor confidence in those markets and thereby ensuring a level playing field for all market participants. It sets out a framework for the prevention, detection and efficient sanction of market abuse, imposes new obligations on market participants, entrusts the CSSF with specific competences and missions and sets down preventive measures. On 3 July 2016, the Market Abuse Regulation came into effect and superseded Directive 2003/6/EC.
The Market Abuse Legal Framework applies to all securities admitted to trading on at least one regulated market or for which a request for admission to trading on such a market has been made. Prohibitions of market abuse also apply to all financial instruments admitted to trading on at least one MTF or one organised trading facility (OTF) or for which a request for admission to trading on an MTF or an OTF has been made. This obligation applies whether or not the transaction was carried out on such a regulated market or such an MTF or an OTF. The new Market Abuse Legal Framework broadened its scope of application in comparison with the earlier applicable legislation by applying also to emission allowances auctions and certain spot commodities contracts.
The Market Abuse Law lays down a set of requirements for market participants with the major aim of preventing market abuse, namely:
- market operators and investment firms that operate a trading venue in Luxembourg are required to report to the CSSF without delay orders and transactions, including any cancellation or modification thereof, that could constitute insider dealing, market manipulation or attempted insider dealing;
- the regulated markets, credit institutions, investment firms and market operators of an MTF or an OTF must adopt and maintain effective arrangements, systems and procedures aimed at preventing and detecting insider dealing, market manipulation and attempted insider dealing and market manipulation;
- issuers of financial instruments are required to disclose to the public inside information that directly concerns them as soon as possible;
- issuers or persons acting on their behalf and for their account must establish a list of persons who have access to inside information;
- persons discharging managerial responsibilities within an issuer that has its registered office in Luxembourg and persons closely associated with them must notify to the CSSF and to the issuer or the emission allowance market and make public: in respect of issuers, all operations conducted on their own account related to the issuer’s shares admitted to trading on a regulated market, or to derivatives or other financial instruments linked to these shares; and in respect of emission allowance market participants, every transaction conducted on their own account relating to emission allowances, to auction products based thereon or to derivatives relating thereto; and
- persons who produce or disseminate investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy in Luxembourg must ensure that the recommendations are presented objectively, that they clearly mention conflicts of interest, and that they include all the other references provided for by the law.
The Luxembourg Company Law also imposes fines and imprisonment on any person who, by fraudulent means, causes or attempts to cause the price of company shares, bonds or other securities to rise or fall (article 1500-4 of the Company Law of 10 August 1915).
Permitted stabilisation measures
What measures are permitted in your jurisdiction to support the price of securities in connection with an offering?
The provisions of the Stabilisation Regulation and of the Market Abuse Regulation relating to buy-back programmes and price stabilisation have a direct binding effect in the Luxembourg territory. Any price stabilisation programmes and buy-backs aimed at supporting the price of securities must comply with article 5 of the Market Abuse Regulation and the Second European Company Directive that prohibits an EU entity from redeeming its own shares beyond certain limits.
It is worth noting that Luxembourg permits stabilisation transactions prior to the commencement of trading on a regulated market. Under the present terms of the Stabilisation Regulation, overallotment with the view to support the price of the securities is authorised, provided that:
- the securities are over-allotted only during the subscription period and at the offer price;
- a position resulting from the exercise of an overallotment facility by an investment firm or credit institution that is not covered by the greenshoe option may not exceed 5 per cent of the original offer;
- the greenshoe option may be exercised by the beneficiaries of such an option only where relevant securities have been overallotted;
- the greenshoe option may not amount to more than 15 per cent of the original offer;
- the exercise period of the greenshoe option must be the same as the stabilisation period required; and
- the exercise of the greenshoe option must be disclosed to the public promptly, together with all appropriate details, including in particular the date of exercise and the number and nature of relevant securities involved.
Issuers, offerors or entities undertaking the stabilisation must record each stabilisation order or transaction with, as a minimum, all related relevant information and data (in particular, the name and number of securities bought or sold, the date and time of the transaction, the price of the transaction and the possibility to identify the investment firm) extended to financial instruments other than those admitted or going to be admitted to the regulated market.
Liabilities and enforcement
Bases of liability
What are the most common bases of liability for a securities transaction?
Liability arising from inaccurate or misleading information or untrue representations made in the prospectus is the most common liability. This liability is based on the general principles of liability in tort set out in the Luxembourg Civil Code (articles 1382 and 1383). This liability relies on the issuer, the offeror, the person asking for the admission to trading or the guarantor. These persons must be clearly identified in the prospectus. They must also state in the prospectus that to the best of their knowledge it does not contain any incorrect facts or omissions that are likely to affect its import. This statement increases the likelihood that they must assume the direct responsibility for any damages resulting from any inaccuracy in the prospectus. These statements do not release the other contributors to the prospectus from their liability, if it is evidenced that they have been providing false or misleading information. The summary note does not entail any civil liability unless it is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent with the main prospectus.
Where the security transaction is based on a contractual relationship, the liability would be assessed on the basis of the general principles of contract law. This would be the case in the event of an underwriting agreement with the issuer or direct contractual relationship between the issuer and the subscriber of securities. The liability will be triggered at the occurrence of a negligence or fraud, as this will be further set out in the contractual agreement governing the security transaction and the general principles of contract law.
What are the main mechanisms for seeking remedies and sanctions for improper securities activities?
Remedies and sanctions for improper securities activities can be brought in three basic ways: civil litigation, administrative proceedings and criminal prosecutions. None of these remedies are exclusive.
Civil litigation may be brought by private parties that would generally seek to recover losses suffered. The damage would be generally assessed in respect of the liability in tort contained in the Luxembourg Civil Code. However, the occurrence of a specific damage to the investor is unlikely to be recognised to the extent that courts would usually refuse to consider the loss of value of shares as a prejudice distinct from the prejudice suffered by the issuer.
Administrative proceedings may be brought by the CSSF or the LuxSE, pursuant to the Prospectus Law, as applicable, the Prospectus Regulation, the LuxSE Rules and Regulations or other applicable and relevant regulation. In addition, the CSSF has investigative powers and the capacity to suspend or prohibit a public offer or admission to trading on a regulated market if it has reasonable grounds for suspecting that legal provisions have been infringed. It may also impose cease-and-desist orders for any improper activities that are contrary to the Prospectus Law. The CSSF may render these decisions public and impose financial administrative sanctions of a pecuniary nature with the view to enforce its decisions.
An appeal to a court of unlimited jurisdiction may be made before the administrative court against decisions taken by the CSSF. Decisions taken by market operators are subject to a right of appeal before the ordinary jurisdictions.
Criminal prosecutions are instituted by the public prosecutor, acting independently and on its own initiative or at the request of CSSF. Various improper securities activities are deemed as criminal offences. For instance, anyone who knowingly carries out an offer of securities to the public within the territory of Luxembourg without a prospectus in accordance with the provisions of the Prospectus Law may be subject to a fine ranging from €250 to €125,000. The Company Law also sets out diverse criminal offences for breach of its provisions, such as the manipulation of the price of securities. Any interested party may lodge a complaint with the public prosecutor against the person or company deemed to be liable, accompanied by a request for compensation of loss, if any. Defendants subject to such criminal actions may face substantial fines, corporate dissolution and, in the case of individuals, imprisonment.
Update and trends
Are there current proposals to change the regulatory or statutory framework governing securities transactions?
21 Are there current proposals to change the regulatory or statutory framework governing securities transactions?
At the end of September 2018, the government lodged a draft bill amending the law relating to the transfer of securities with the parliament. The purpose of this bill is to extend the scope of the law of 1 August 2001 on the transfer of securities to allow securities account keepers to manage security transfers by means of secured electronic devices including, inter alia, registers or electronic databases of the blockchain type.
Although there is currently no legislation dedicated to blockchain in Luxembourg, the Luxembourg legislator is striving to stay at the leading edge of financial technologies. Further bills may be filed by the government in the coming months to adapt the Luxembourg legislation to the latest transformations entailed by financial technologies.