• Login
  • Register
  • PRO
    • PRO Compliance plan
    • PRO Compliance
    • PRO subscription plans
    • Curated articles
    • In-depth
    • Market intelligence
    • Practice guides
    • PRO Reports New
    • Lexology GTDT
    • Ask Lexy
  • PRO
  • Latest
  • GTDT
  • Research
  • Learn
  • Experts
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Explore
  • Legal Research
  • Primary SourcesBeta
  • PRO Compliance

Introducing PRO Compliance
The essential resource for in-house professionals

  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre New

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates New

Lexology PRO

Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 

PRO Compliance plan
PRO subscription plans

Premium content

  • Curated articles
  • In-depth
  • Market intelligence
  • Practice guides
  • PRO Reports New

Analysis tools

  • Lexology GTDT
  • Ask Lexy
Explore all PRO content PRO Compliance
  • Find experts
  • About
  • Firms
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

California Supreme Court's Prop 64 ruling breathes new life into UCL class actions

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA May 19 2009

On May 18, 2009, in In re Tobacco II Cases, No. S147345 (“Tobacco”), the California Supreme Court answered two questions raised by Proposition 64, a November 2004 voter initiative that amended California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”): Who in a UCL class action must comply with Proposition 64’s standing requirements – just the representative plaintiff, or all putative class members – in order for the class action to proceed, and what is the causation requirement for the purpose of establishing standing under the UCL?

 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - Daveed A. Schwartz, Roxane A. Polidora and Ryan K. Takemoto
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Litigation
  • Product Regulation & Liability
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Tagged with

  • California
  • SCOTUS
  • Constitutional amendment
  • Class action
  • California Supreme Court
  • Standing (law)
  • Voting
  • Tobacco products

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Eminent Domain in California - What You Should Know, and What You Should Do, Before the Government Decides to Take Your Property *
  2. Fundamentos de seguros comerciales en los Estados Unidos *
  3. Individual fined $15,000 for operating CB radio transmitter from his home *
  4. Side A DIC Insurance - The D&O Safety Net *
  5. Employee data privacy - an overview of employer responsibilities *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
loading...

Related topic hubs

  1. Class action
  2. SCOTUS
  3. USA
  4. Product Regulation & Liability
  5. Litigation

Related USA articles

  1. California Supreme Court holds that only individual representatives in UCL class actions are required to satisfy the standing requirements of Proposition 64 *
  2. Did the latest California Supreme Court UCL decision create more uncertainty? *
  3. Supreme Court clarifies standing and reliance rules for 17200 consumer class action claims *
Audrey E Mross
Labor & Employment Attorney
Munck Carter LLP
What our clients say

“The Lexology newsfeed is very relevant to my practice and I like that you can tailor the newsfeed to include specific practice areas. I enjoy seeing a variety of approaches and I will read multiple articles on the same topic for the purpose of getting the fullest understanding of a new law, a court case or other legal development.”

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research