• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

California Supreme Court's Prop 64 ruling breathes new life into UCL class actions

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA May 19 2009

On May 18, 2009, in In re Tobacco II Cases, No. S147345 (“Tobacco”), the California Supreme Court answered two questions raised by Proposition 64, a November 2004 voter initiative that amended California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”): Who in a UCL class action must comply with Proposition 64’s standing requirements – just the representative plaintiff, or all putative class members – in order for the class action to proceed, and what is the causation requirement for the purpose of establishing standing under the UCL?

 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - Daveed A. Schwartz, Roxane A. Polidora and Ryan K. Takemoto

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • California
  • Litigation
  • Product Regulation & Liability
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Topics

  • Class action
  • Standing (law)
  • Voting
  • Tobacco products

Laws

  • Constitutional amendment

Courts

  • SCOTUS
  • California Supreme Court

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Human resources considerations in spinoffs *
  2. Individual fined $15,000 for operating CB radio transmitter from his home *
  3. A step up on step-in rights *
  4. Side A DIC Insurance - The D&O Safety Net *
  5. Spotlight: Islamic financing and investment structures in USA *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to avoid liability for defective products in supply of goods agreements (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: What to consider when reviewing terms and conditions for the purchase of goods and services (buyer’s perspective) – B2B (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: International supply of goods contracts (USA)

Related research hubs

  • SCOTUS
  • Class action
  • USA
  • Litigation
  • Product Regulation & Liability
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research