• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Masterclasses
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

Workplace Watch - Issue 16, October 2017

Chapman Tripp

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Australia October 18 2017

Workplace Watch is a quarterly publication tracking legislative and regulatory reform and important judicial decisions in relation to workforce and workplace law.

This edition comes out as we wait for coalition negotiations to determine the shape and colour of the next government. Chapman Tripp's analysis of what was at stake this election in the area of workplace law and immigration is available here.

Health and safety

Clarity developing around penalty levels under new H&S regime

As more sentences are handed down under the Health and Safety at Work Act (HWSA), the courts are developing a stronger view on appropriate penalty rates and sentencing guidelines.

WorkSafe has been arguing that fines should be increased substantially around eightfold from what applied under the previous legislation. But the court in WorkSafe v Budget Plastics and more recently in WorkSafe v Rangiora Carpets has not been prepared to go this far.

In WorkSafe v Rangiora Carpets, the court agreed with the defence submission that there should be six bands of culpability (WorkSafe wanted three that used the full range of the potential maximum fine) but increased the ranges at the upper ends by around $50,000.

The Judge fixed reparation at $20,000 and took a starting point for the fine of $300,000, which came down to $157,500 after deductions of 30% for mitigating factors and 20% for the guilty plea.

Rangiora argued that it had the financial capacity to pay only $75,000 but the court did not accept this.

The Judge noted that a good corporate citizen like Rangiora Carpets should not be put out of business by a single accident but said fines must "bite". The prosecution arose after a worker fell from an unconsented mezzanine floor lacking any balustrade and broke several bones.

The written decision is not yet available but Chapman Tripp attended the sentencing.

In Budget Plastics, the Judge said the company would have been fined around $275,000 but reduced this to $100,000 having accepted arguments that this was all Budget could afford to pay.

Rangiora Carpets is the first judgment to engage with what the appropriate bands should be under the new regime. While early indications are that the courts are adopting an approach that is more in line with defence submissions, we will have to await decisions in the High Court to establish real sentencing guidelines.

Link: Chapman Tripp commentary (on WorkSafe v Budget Plastics)

Wellness in the workplace survey

The annual survey sponsored by BusinessNZ and Southern Cross has found that:

average days are still higher for manual workers but are on a downward trajectory while they are rising for non-manual employees

more than 40% of staff will go to work while sick, despite clear communication to stay at home, and

WWatrckhplace

Contents

Health and safety

1

Employment2

Immigration4

Contacts4

2 | October 2017

overall stress/anxiety levels are continuing to rise (as they did in the previous two surveys, published in 2013 and 2015).

Link: Wellness in the Workplace survey, 2017

Court highly critical of last party charged in rubbish collector's death

Truck Leasing Ltd (TLL) one of four parties charged in connection with Jane Devonshire's death has been found guilty of failing to take all practicable steps to ensure a safe workplace. The company will be sentenced on 13 October.

TLL was the only party to be tried because the other three Veolia Environmental Services, which leased the faulty truck, NP Dobbe (NPD) that was responsible for maintaining it and Auckland Council as the principal contractor all entered guilty pleas.

WorkSafe tells all

WorkSafe has created a website listing all of its assessment and enforcement activities and all notifications back to 2008.

Link: Website

Employment

Closing the gender pay gap

The gender pay gap in the 15 years since 2001 has hovered between a high of 13.1% and a low of 2.1% and currently sits at 12%. Using research produced by the Ministry for Women, the government has released a report suggesting seven actions employers can take:

The Court said TLL seemed to regard itself as insulated from any responsibility for safety by the legal and contractual obligations on Veolia (now Onyx) and NPD. But the trucks were "obviously worn out" and the Judge had drawn "an inevitable inference" that because they were nearing the end of their useful lives, TLL had "a philosophy of altogether avoiding costs wherever possible".

He found that TLL had failed to ensure:

the brakes on the truck were safe and lawful

agreed servicing timeframes were being met

the service regime was adequate to keep the fleet operating safely and that each party understood its responsibilities

NPD staff had access to the necessary service facilities, and

NPD was undertaking repair work to an appropriate standard, and appropriately communicating outstanding safety issues to TLL and Onyx.

lead from the top make a plan analyse your data be aware of bias redesign your talent management process maximise female talent, and normalise flexible work and parental leave for men and women.

Link: Report

Supreme Court knocks back caregiver's appeal

The Supreme Court has found by a three/two majority that relief residential caregiver Janet Lowe was not engaged as a "homeworker" and therefore was not entitled to the statutory benefits conferred by the Employment Relations Act.

Link: Decision

WWatrckhplace

Contents

Health and safety

1

Employment2

Immigration4

Contacts4

The decision is in line with the Employment Relations Authority and the Court of Appeal but the Employment Court took a different view, partly because Ms Lowe had been providing relief care for a long period a consideration the Court of Appeal considered was irrelevant.

It found and the Supreme Court agreed that the normal meaning of "engage" contemplated that the hirer selected the person engaged but that did not apply in this case. Under the Carer Support scheme, relief carers were engaged by the primary carer without reference to the Ministry of Health or the DHB.

Link: Supreme Court decision

Supreme Court promotes primacy of New Zealand law for conduct in New Zealand

The Supreme Court has found by unanimous judgment that Cathay Pacific pilots employed on Hong Kong based contracts can bring discrimination claims under New Zealand law.

The two pilots, challenged under the New Zealand Employment Relations Act, a provision in their contract, which allowed their employer to enforce a mandatory retirement age of 55 years.

The Employment Court held that the Employments Relations Act applied and that they could not be required to retire by reason of their age. The Court of Appeal overturned that decision, determining that Hong Kong law prevailed.

Regional youth employment strategy

A social investment approach is being applied to 5,280 unemployed youth in four regions struck by high unemployment Hawke's Bay, Northland, the Eastern Bay of Plenty and the East Coast.

The aim is to get them into jobs and to put their lives on to a more positive trajectory. The $50m funding over four years was allocated in the budget and includes $8m for initiatives directed to Mori.

Link: Statement

Regulation of advocates?

Employment advocates may be regulated after reports of inappropriate behaviour, over-charging and abuse of `no win, no fee' arrangements.

Workplace Relations Minister Michael Woodhouse has told Newsroom Pro that the problems are confined to a "small cohort" but that he is keen to do something about it and had asked his officials to formulate some options.

The Fair Work Commission in Australia has implemented a yellow and red card system which could be implemented here but would require legislative change.

The Supreme Court adopted a very different approach. Rather than considering the jurisdiction applying to the contract, it focused on the proper ambit of both the Human Rights Act and the Employment Relations Act and found that anti-discrimination provisions in both Acts applied to conduct in New Zealand and therefore that the pilots were entitled to pursue their claims.

3 | October 2017

WWatrckhplace

Contents

Health and safety

1

Employment2

Immigration4

Contacts4

Immigration

Tweaks to temporary work visas softened for "mid-skilled" migrants

The government has reduced the remuneration threshold for skilled migrants to include "semi-skilled" applicants. It will now be set at 85% of the median income (which, on current figures, produces an amount of $41,538 a year rather than $48,895 as proposed in April).

The effect is to release more workers from the three year limit and to open the possibility of permanent residency.

The change was in response to intense lobbying from employers anxious that they may no longer be able to access sufficient migrant labour.

Link: Announcement

Our national team of employment specialists can assist you in all areas of employment law, including personal grievances, litigation, union issues (negotiations, disputes and mediations), redundancies, restructuring, senior executive employment, exit negotiations, post-employment conduct, and health and safety.

Contacts

Marie Wisker Partner T: +64 9 358 9845 M: +64 27 559 8571 E: [email protected] Garth Gallaway Partner T: +64 3 345 9540 M: +64 27 507 5390 E: [email protected]

Geoff Carter Special Counsel T: +64 3 353 0394 M: +64 27 290 5057 E: [email protected]

4 | October 2017

Chapman Tripp - Marie Wisker, Garth Gallaway and Geoff Carter

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Australia
  • Employment & Labor
  • Litigation
  • Public
  • Chapman Tripp

Topics

  • Gender pay gap
  • Occupational safety and health

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Directors' backsides exposed if "noses in, fingers out" becomes "hands off, eyes shut" *
  2. Can you sell your customer database? *
  3. Cover pricing in construction tenders: a risky business *
  4. Going to market - consumer law update *
  5. Going to market - consumer law update *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to draft an employment contract (USA) Recently updated
  • How-to guide How-to guide: Overview of US employment law (USA) Recently updated
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to draft the key provisions of an employee handbook (USA) Recently updated
View all

Related research hubs

  • Gender pay gap
  • Australia
  • Employment & Labor
  • Litigation
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2023 Law Business Research

Law Business Research