Use the Lexology Navigator tool to compare the answers in this article with those from other jurisdictions.
Conditions for recognition and enforcement
Which types of judgment (eg, monetary judgments, mandatory or prohibitory orders) are enforceable in your jurisdiction and which (if any) are explicitly excluded from recognition and enforcement (eg, default judgments, judgments granting punitive damages)?
Monetary judgments and mandatory and prohibitory orders are enforceable in Romania. Further, the following types of judgment are not explicitly excluded from recognition and enforcement:
- default judgments (ie, when the defendant fails to perform a court-ordered action and the foreign court subsequently settles the legal dispute in the claimant’s favour); and
- judgments granting punitive damages, such as exemplary, retributory or vindictive damages (ie, damages awarded in excess of the claimant’s loss, which are intended to punish the defendant).
However, these judgments can raise public order violation issues, as the court may consider that the principle of proportionality between the prejudice and the repair measures is thereby violated.
How are foreign judgments subject to appeal treated?
Foreign judgments subject to appeal cannot be recognised or enforced in Romania. However, certain exceptions to this rule exist, such as foreign judgments that are recognised in Romania de jure (ie, as of right, without there being a need for a Romanian court of justice ruling in this respect). Foreign judgments are recognised in Romania de jure if:
- they refer to the personal status of the citizens of the state where they have been issued; or
- when issued in a third state:
- the citizens’ state of citizenship has previously recognised the judgment; or
- the judgment was issued based on the law determined to be applicable under Romanian private international law, provided that it is not contrary to the public order of Romanian law and that the right to defence has been respected.
What are the formal and documentary requirements for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments?
Requests for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment will be drawn up in accordance with the general requirements regarding court claims set out in the Civil Procedure Code. The application should thus include:
- the parties’ names and other identifying elements;
- the claims;
- the factual and legal reasons behind the claims;
- the supporting evidence; and
- the submitting party’s signature.
The following documents should be enclosed:
- a copy of the foreign judgment;
- proof of the foreign judgment’s definitive nature; and
- proof that the summons and the submission of the claim have been communicated to the counterparty by the foreign court or another official document stating that the counterparty knew of the summons and the claim in due course.
In addition to the enforcement request, evidence of the enforceability of the foreign judgment (ie, an official document issued by the foreign court that rendered the judgment) must be appended.
What substantive requirements (if any) apply to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments? Are enforcing courts in your jurisdiction permitted to review the foreign judgment on the merits?
Certain judgments are recognised de jure, such as:
- judgments regarding the personal status of citizens of the state where the judgments were pronounced;
- judgments pronounced in a third state, which were recognised in each parties’ state of citizenship or nationality; and
- judgments that have been pronounced on the basis of the law determined to be applicable under Romanian private international law, provided that they are not contrary to the public order of Romanian law and that the right to a defence has been respected.
The following requirements must be met for the recognition of other judgments:
- the judgment must be final according to the law of the state where it was pronounced;
- the court issuing the judgment must, under the law of the state of residence, have jurisdiction to hear the case. However, the jurisdiction should not be determined exclusively by the presence in that state of the defendant or its property that does not relate directly to the dispute; and
- there must be reciprocity regarding the effects of foreign judgments between Romania and the state of the court that delivered the judgment.
The same conditions must be fulfilled for the enforcement of a judgment. In addition, the judgment must be enforceable according to the law of the state where it was delivered.
Enforcing courts cannot review foreign judgments on the merits.
What is the limitation period for enforcement of a foreign judgment?
The limitation period for the enforcement of a foreign judgment is governed by the law of the state that delivered the judgment. After a Romanian court delivers an enforcement decision, the limitation period for the forced execution is:
- 10 years in matters concerning real rights (eg, ownership, use, pledge, usufruct, mortgage, habitation and servitude); and
- generally three years for matters concerning personal rights (eg, the recovery of a receivable or loan and material prejudice).
Grounds for refusal
On what grounds can recognition and enforcement be refused?
Recognition and enforcement can be refused on the following grounds:
- the judgment is manifestly contrary to the public order of Romanian private international law; this incompatibility is determined by considering, in particular:
- the intensity of the link between the case and the Romanian legal order; and
- the gravity of the effect thus produced;
- the judgment rendered in a matter in which persons do not dispose of their rights freely has been obtained solely for the purpose of circumventing the cause of incidence of applicable law under Romanian private international law;
- the lawsuit has been settled between the same parties by a decision, even if not final, of the Romanian courts or is pending before them on the date of referral to the foreign court;
- the judgment is incompatible with a decision that has previously been pronounced abroad and is likely to be recognised in Romania;
- the Romanian courts had international exclusive jurisdiction to hear the case;
- the right to defence has been violated; or
- the judgment may be the subject of an appeal in the state that rendered the judgment (unless the judgment may be enforced even where it is not final, as discussed above).
Service of process
To what extent does the enforcing court review the service of process in the original foreign proceedings?
If the judgment was rendered in the absence of the party that lost the trial before the foreign court, the enforcing court must ensure that the losing party:
- received the counterparty’s claim;
- was summoned for debates; and
- was given the opportunity to defend itself and appeal the decision.
For the court to be able to review the service of process (namely, to ensure that a party’s right to defend itself was fully observed), the claimant must attach to the enforcement request:
- proof that the summons and a copy of the claim were handed in, as delivered to the missing party in the foreign court; or
- another official document stating that the summons and the claim were known in due time by the party against whom the ruling was pronounced.
What public policy issues are considered in the court’s decision to grant recognition and enforcement? Is there any notable case law in this regard?
The Romanian courts of justice do not grant recognition and enforcement if the foreign judgment is manifestly contrary to the public order of Romanian private international law. Notable public policy issues are:
- a party’s right to defence;
- the adversarial principle (namely, if a party was incorrectly summoned);
- the exclusive international jurisdiction of the Romanian courts to hear the case; and
- a violation of the fundamental principles of Romanian law, EU law or fundamental human rights.
What is the extent of the enforcing court’s power to review the personal and subject-matter jurisdiction of the foreign court that issued the judgment?
The enforcing court may deny the recognition or enforcement of a judgment only if:
- the Romanian courts had exclusive jurisdiction to hear the case; or
- there is no significant link between the state of the foreign court and the dispute solved by the foreign court.
Thus, the enforcing court does not analyse the personal and subject matter jurisdiction of the foreign court, which are determined by the law of the foreign state.
Concurrent proceedings and conflicting judgments
How do the courts in your jurisdiction address applications for recognition and enforcement where there are concurrent proceedings (foreign or domestic) or conflicting judgments involving the same parties/dispute?
The Romanian courts will deny the recognition or enforcement of a judgment issued by a foreign court if:
- the same dispute is pending before or has been resolved by a domestic court; and
- the judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment issued by another foreign court that could be enforced in Romania.
Click here to view the full article.