In December 2015, over five years after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted a final rule regarding margin for uncleared swaps (the “CFTC margin rule”) and an interim final rule exempting non-financial and certain other end-users who are eligible for the end-user clearing exception from the scope of the CFTC margin rule. Accordingly, non-financial end-users who rely on the end- user exception are exempt from margining requirements.

The CFTC’s final rule supplements the final margin rule adopted in October 2015 by a group of US “prudential regulators”, namely the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Farm Credit Administration and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (the “Bank margin rule”). The CFTC deferred to the “prudential regulators”, such that any swap entered into by a swap dealer (“SD”) or major swap participant (“MSP”) that is regulated by a prudential regulator is subject to the Bank margin rule and not the CFTC margin rule.

While the two rules are not identical, the CFTC indicated in its discussion that the CFTC margin rule “essentially provide[s] for the same treatment as the [Bank margin rule] with a few exceptions”1. The CFTC margin rule and the Bank margin rule are collectively referred to herein as the “margin  rules”.


The margin rules apply only to uncleared swaps entered into after the applicable compliance date. Based on the Secretary of Treasury determination in 2012 to exempt foreign exchange swaps and deliverable foreign exchange forwards from the definition of “swap” for purposes of application of margin rules and for certain other purposes, transactions in these products are not required to be margined under the margin rules.2 Cross currency swaps3 are covered, but initial margin calculated using a model need not recognise any risks or risk factors associated with the fixed, physically-settled foreign exchange transactions associated with the exchange of principal embedded in the uncleared cross-currency swap.4  Non-deliverable foreign exchange forwards and currency options are considered swaps and are covered by the margin rules.

The margin rules require bilateral margining by both SDs and MSPs and their counterparties who are subject to the margin rules.


The margin rules apply to covered swaps if (i) both parties are SDs or MSPs or (ii) one party is an SD or MSP and the other party is a “financial end-user”. Financial end-users are non-SDs and non-MSPs and include, but are not limited to:

  • Banks and other depository institutions;
  • Bank holding companies;
  • State-licensed credit or lending entities, including finance companies, money services businesses and currency dealers;
  • Securities holding companies, brokers, dealers, investment companies and investment advisers;
  • Private funds5;
  • Commodity pools, commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors;
  • Employee benefit plans, including ERISA plans;
  • Insurance companies; and
  • Entities or arrangements that raise or accept money for clients or investors or use their own funds for investing or trading in loans, securities, swaps funds or other assets.

Securitisation vehicles that fit within any of the enumerated categories are covered.

The following entity types are excluded from the definition of “financial end-user”:

  • Sovereign entities;
  • Multilateral development banks;
  • The Bank for International Settlements;
  • Captive finance companies whose swaps are exempt from clearing; and
  • Treasury affiliates whose swaps are exempt from clearing or otherwise exempt from the CFTC margin rule by rule.


Inter-affiliate swaps are treated differently under the two margin rules.


Under the CFTC margin rule, initial margin generally is not required to be posted if the conditions set forth for a clearing exemption in the CFTC’s 2013 final rule entitled “Clearing Exemption for Swaps Between Certain Affiliated Entities” are satisfied.6  However, SDs and MSPs that are subject to the CFTC margin rule must collect initial margin from non-US affiliates that are not subject to comparable initial margin requirements on these affiliates’ swaps with third party financial end-users. In addition, SDs and MSPs trading with affiliates that are subject to the Bank margin rule must post initial margin as required by that rule. Variation margin must be posted to and collected from each affiliate that is a SD, MSP or financial end-user.


Under the Bank margin rule, a covered SD or MSP must collect initial margin from its affiliate counterparties that are SDs, MSPs or financial end-users, and must post initial margin only to SD and MSP affiliates, in each case subject to a US$20 million threshold. If the covered SD or MSP is not required to post initial margin, it still must calculate daily the amount of initial margin that would have been required if its counterparty was not an affiliate. Variation margin must be posted and collected to and from each affiliate that is a SD, MSP or financial end-user.


SDs and MSPs must collect initial margin from, and post  initial margin to, financial end-users that have “material swaps exposure” and to other SDs and MSPs regardless of exposure. An entity has material swaps exposure if the average daily notional amount of its uncleared swaps, including security- based swaps, deliverable foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps, exceeds US$8 billion during June, July and August of the previous year. Initial margin may be calculated using an approved risk-based model or based on a standardised table that sets minimum gross margin requirements based on product type and trade duration. SDs and MSPs may apply an initial margin threshold of up to US$50 million on a consolidated entity level including all affiliates of both parties, subject to a minimum transfer amount (“MTA”) not to exceed US$500,000 in aggregate with the MTA applied to variation margin. Initial margin must be held for the duration of the transaction with a qualifying custodian under the applicable custodian rules and may not be offset against variation margin collected from the counterparty.


On a daily basis, SDs and MSPs must collect variation margin from, and post variation margin to, financial end users and  to other SDs and MSPs, in each case regardless of exposure. No threshold is permitted, although an MTA not to exceed US$500,000 may be employed to the extent not used in the determination of initial margin.


The margin rules specify permissible collateral types for initial and variation margin. Variation margin must be posted in  cash in any major currency or a currency of settlement of the swap. The permissible collateral types for initial margin are broader and include US Treasuries and other enumerated securities. The margin value of securities posted as collateral must be reduced by haircuts of at least the amounts set forth in the margin rules.


Each SD and MSP must execute documentation with each counterparty that complies both with the CFTC’s swap trading relationship documentation rules and the margin rules. The CFTC’s swap trading relationship documentation rules require credit support arrangements including initial and variation margin requirements, if any, eligible collateral types with haircuts, investment and rehypothecation terms, and custodial arrangements.7

When an SD or MSP enters into uncleared swaps with another SD or MSP or a financial end-user, margin documentation must contain initial and variation margin terms that comply with the requirements of the margin rules. Margin documentation must contain specified valuation,  initial margin calculation, and dispute resolution procedures.8 Title transfers such as those effected under the ISDA Credit Support Annex (“CSA”) subject to English law published in 1995 would not be effective margin transfers under the margin rules.9 As expected by the industry, it is likely that parties will be required to use new collateral documentation tailored specifically for the margin rules.


In order to net exposures for both initial and variation margin, par ties subject to the margin rules must have an “eligible master netting agreement”. The CFTC indicated in its discussion of the CFTC margin rule that it intended the criteria for an “eligible master netting agreement” to be “consistent with industry standards currently being used”10 for determining eligibility for netting for bank regulatory capital purposes. This requirement would foreclose netting when SDs and MSPs trade with financial end-users organised in jurisdictions in which industry standard legal opinions are not available and with counterparty types where the SD or MSP cannot (or does not) obtain required netting and enforceability opinions.

The margin rules contemplate that swap participants may create separate margining portfolios under a single eligible master netting agreement, with margining occurring on a net basis within each separate margining portfolio. For example, parties could use their existing pre-compliance collateral documentation, if any, to margin (or not margin) all swaps executed prior to the relevant compliance date, and use post-compliance collateral documentation to margin only a portfolio of post-compliance trades. However, the margin rules require that each swap under a separate margining portfolio be margined in accordance with the margin rule requirements if at least one swap in the portfolio is a covered by the rule. That is, if separate margining portfolios are not created, then the margin rules will apply to both pre-compliance and post-compliance swaps.

It does not appear mandatory that the netting and enforceability opinions required for an “eligible master netting agreement” set forth the differences under applicable insolvency law, if any, between the treatment of separate margining portfolios under a single eligible master netting agreement and such an agreement with a single margining portfolio.


The margin rules do not require any variation margin to  be held with a custodian. However, all initial margin posted and collected under the margin rules must be held with an unaffiliated custodian pursuant to an enforceable custody agreement and may not be rehypothecated. Accordingly, SDs and MSPs will need to obtain enforceability opinions on its custody agreements in the jurisdictions of both the custodian and its counterparty.11


The margin rules contain phased compliance dates based on the magnitude of the parties’ swap positions. The compliance dates are as follows:

  • 1 September 2016, if the average daily aggregate  notional amount of both parties’ and their qualifying affiliates’ uncleared swaps, including security-based  swaps, deliverable foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps (collectively, the “ADANA”), exceeds US$3 trillion during March, April and May of 2016;
  • 1 March 2017, for variation margin between SDs and MSPs and any other counterparty;
  • 1 September 2017, for initial margin, if the ADANA exceeds US$2.25 trillion during March, April and May of 2017;
  • 1 September 2018, for initial margin, if the ADANA exceeds US$1.5 trillion during March, April and May of 2018;
  • 1 September 2019, for initial margin, if the ADANA exceeds US$0.75 trillion during March, April and May of 2019; and
  • 1 September 2020, for all other initial margin.