We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Opportunities for longer patent term adjustments

Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA January 14 2009

The term of a U.S. utility patent is not always easy to calculate.

Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ngelaw.com/attorney/bio.aspx?ID=745">Robert E. Browne</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ngelaw.com/attorney/bio.aspx?ID=1351">Diane J. Romza-Kutz</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ngelaw.com/attorney/bio.aspx?ID=1367">Verne A. Luckow</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ngelaw.com/attorney/bio.aspx?ID=1243">Robert E. Browne, Jr.</a>
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • USA
  • Intellectual Property
  • Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

Tagged with

  • Term of patent

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Let the sun shine in or face liability under the ADA *
  2. Beware aggressive marketers of Asian domain names *
  3. Contract auto-renewals not necessarily so “automatic” as recent NY case demonstrates *
  4. Comparing Illinois versus California bad faith law *
  5. Defective construction claims: where breach of warranty and covered occurrences merge or divide *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Intellectual Property

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Patents

  1. USA
  2. Taiwan
  3. GCC
  4. More...
Kenneth R Gilberg
Partner
Flaster/Greenberg PC
What our clients say

"Lexology is excellent and I look forward to reading it each day. It’s great!”

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group