• Login
  • Register
  • PRO
    • PRO Compliance plan
    • PRO Compliance
    • PRO subscription plans
    • Curated articles
    • In-depth
    • Market intelligence
    • Practice guides
    • PRO Reports New
    • Lexology GTDT
    • Ask Lexy
  • PRO
  • Latest
  • GTDT
  • Research
  • Learn
  • Experts
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Explore
  • Legal Research
  • Primary SourcesBeta
  • PRO Compliance

Introducing PRO Compliance
The essential resource for in-house professionals

  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre New

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates New

Lexology PRO

Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 

PRO Compliance plan
PRO subscription plans

Premium content

  • Curated articles
  • In-depth
  • Market intelligence
  • Practice guides
  • PRO Reports New

Analysis tools

  • Lexology GTDT
  • Ask Lexy
Explore all PRO content PRO Compliance
  • Find experts
  • About
  • Firms
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

Sidley Shale and Hydraulic Fracturing Report - December 22, 2015

Sidley Austin LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA December 22 2015

Federal

United States appeals preliminary injunction issued by district court judge staying new Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rules governing hydraulic fracturing on federal and tribal lands. The United States has appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit a September 30, 2015 district court order granting the state plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction staying the implementation of BLM’s new rules governing hydraulic fracturing on federal and tribal lands. The state plaintiff, joined by industry intervenors, challenged the rules on a number of grounds, including that BLM did not have authority to issue the regulations. During the appeal of the preliminary injunction, the litigation will proceed in district court, as the lower court denied a motion by environmental groups that had intervened on behalf of BLM asking the court to consolidate the merits with the preliminary injunction so that the full litigation could be heard in one appeal to the circuit court. The groups had argued the preliminary injunction was on a dispositive legal issue, but the lower court disagreed, holding its findings were based on the preliminary injunction standard and that state and industry plaintiff/intervenors should be able to pursue their challenges based on the complete administrative record before a final judgment is reached.

“Sue and settle” agreement between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and environmental groups over toxic release inventory (TRI) reporting. EPA and a group of environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) filed a joint stipulation to dismiss a lawsuit in which the NGOs had sought to compel EPA to act on the NGOs’ 2012 petition to extend TRI reporting requirements to the oil and gas extraction sector. EPA had responded to the petition in October by agreeing to start a rulemaking process to add natural gas processing facilities to the scope of facilities covered by TRI rules but denied the request as to other activities, including drilling operations. 

Studies

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports substantial recoverable natural gas resources in the Barnett Shale. A recent USGS study concludes that the Barnett Shale in Texas has extensive oil and natural gas resources recoverable for production. In particular, the USGS estimates the Barnett Shale might have up to 53 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered, technically recoverable, natural gas. That figure is double the agency’s 2003 estimate, which was prepared before the widespread use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. The USGS also reports that the Barnett Shale has 172 million barrels of recoverable oil. USGS estimates take into account only oil and gas that are technically recoverable with existing technology — without considering the market economics of doing so.

Study indicates mixed effects of hydraulic fracturing on local property values. A recent study by university academics and researchers at an environmental group concluded that hydraulic fracturing operations can have both positive and negative effects on local housing prices, depending on the water source used by nearby residents. The researchers looked at data from Pennsylvania and concluded that groundwater-dependent homes located near hydraulic fracturing operations suffered negative effects on housing value but homes that obtained drinking water from public water supplies generally experienced upswings in property value. The study was published in the American Economic Review.

Sidley Austin LLP - Roger R. Martella, Jr., Samuel B. Boxerman, Joel F. Visser, Jim Wedeking and Benjamin E. Tannen
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Energy & Natural Resources
  • Environment & Climate Change
  • Litigation
  • Sidley Austin LLP

Tagged with

  • Fracking
  • Natural gas
  • Preliminary injunction
  • Bureau of Land Management
  • Tenth Circuit

Popular articles from this firm

  1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Finalizes 16 Nationwide Permits *
  2. EPA Publishes “Transparency in Science” Final Rule *
  3. Corporate Governance in the USA *
  4. DOJ Releases Detailed Statistics on FCA Recoveries Through FY 2020 *
  5. Preparing Your 2020 Form 10-K: A Summary of Recent Key Disclosure Developments, Priorities, and Trends *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
loading...

Related topic hubs

  1. Fracking
  2. USA
  3. Litigation
  4. Environment & Climate Change
Sarah W Gregory
Counsel
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
What our clients say

"I am a regular reader of Lexology, as are a few of my colleagues. I find the email newsfeed useful and of good quality, and in some cases directly on point with issues of concern to the company. It is important to stay current with legal developments, and the articles are a great aid toward this goal. The ability to access the articles without cost is critical and I hope Lexology continues with the good work."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research