In this patent infringement case, the defendant asserted antitrust counterclaims against plaintiffs for violation of the Sherman Act. Here, Visiting Judge Kelly addressed the defendant’s motion to transfer the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The court found that “other than the parties’ incorporation, Delaware has a limited connection to this action.” 2010 WL 4818083, at *7. Although the court acknowledged that Delaware was a “rational choice of forum … due to the parties’ incorporation and, therefore, should not be lightly disturbed,” id. at *7, it concluded that the private and public factors set forth in Jumara v. State Farm Ins. Co., 55 F.3d 873, 879 (3d Cir. 1995), “balance[d] strongly in favor of transfer…” Id. at *7. For example, the court noted that each party’s principal place of business was in California, and most of the witnesses and documents were located there. The court also deemed significant that the parties maintained no facilities, employees, or documents in Delaware, no alleged acts of infringement took place there, and no third-party witnesses were located there. Based on its consideration of these and other similar factors, the court granted the motion to transfer.