In Yocupicio v. PAE Group, LLC, 795 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2015) (No. 15-55878), plaintiff brought nine class claims, which did not satisfy the amount in controversy.  Plaintiffs added a tenth claim, which was not a class claim, but which did satisfy the amount in controversy requirement under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (“CAFA”).  On appeal from the denial of the motion to remand, the Ninth Circuit held that non-class claims cannot be used to support CAFA jurisdiction where the class claims do not meet the CAFA amount in controversy requirement.  The district court erred in not remanding the case to state court.