• Login
  • Register
  • PRO
    • PRO Compliance plan
    • PRO Compliance
    • PRO subscription plans
    • Curated articles
    • In-depth
    • Market intelligence
    • Practice guides
    • PRO Reports New
    • Lexology GTDT
    • Ask Lexy
  • PRO
  • Latest
  • GTDT
  • Research
  • Learn
  • Experts
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Explore
  • Legal Research
  • Primary SourcesBeta
  • PRO Compliance

Introducing PRO Compliance
The essential resource for in-house professionals

  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre New

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates New

Lexology PRO

Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 

PRO Compliance plan
PRO subscription plans

Premium content

  • Curated articles
  • In-depth
  • Market intelligence
  • Practice guides
  • PRO Reports New

Analysis tools

  • Lexology GTDT
  • Ask Lexy
Explore all PRO content PRO Compliance
  • Find experts
  • About
  • Firms
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

HRizon employment law newsletter - November 2019 | Hill Dickinson

Hill Dickinson LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

European Union, United Kingdom November 25 2019

In the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights

Did the use of covert CCTV to monitor workplace theft violate the employees’ right to privacy? Individuals have the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. This right to privacy, and data protection principles, can both have an impact on the legality of any covert monitoring an employer undertakes. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) has recently considered whether the installation and use of covert CCTV in the workplace breached the privacy rights of workers because of its intrusive nature. The Grand Chamber was hearing a rare appeal from an earlier ECrtHR chamber decision. The case had been brought by five supermarket cashiers who argued that their employer’s installation of covert CCTV in the workplace had infringed their right to privacy. The supermarket had identified regular, large-scale stock discrepancies and installed CCTV surveillance cameras as part of its investigation. This included covert cameras filming the area behind the tills. The supermarket did not inform its staff that covert CCTV cameras had been installed (which it was obliged to do under Spanish data protection law). Five employees were recorded stealing and/or helping others to steal; they admitted theft and were dismissed. The Spanish domestic courts held those dismissals to be fair, and that the covert CCTV surveillance had been justified and proportionate. The employees successfully brought claims before the ECrtHR for breach of their right to privacy (the chamber decision). The employer successfully appealed to the Grand Chamber, which overturned the earlier chamber decision. The Grand Chamber held that the fact that the employer had not informed the employees that it had installed covert CCTV, as required by Spanish data protection law, was merely one factor to be taken into account; it was not determinative of whether the intrusion on their right to privacy was proportionate. In this case, the employees had a limited expectation of privacy on the shop floor, the duration of the period of monitoring was short, only a small number of people were permitted to see the covert footage, and warning the employees about the covert CCTV cameras could have jeopardised the investigation. Therefore, the Spanish courts had acted within their margin of discretion in holding the intrusion on their rights to privacy to be proportionate and their dismissals to be fair. However, while employers will welcome the Grand Chamber’s decision, it is important to appreciate that it does not mean routine use of covert CCTV in the workplace will always be acceptable. Human rights and data protection overlap in this area, but are separate bodies of law. If CCTV is used, privacy safeguards must be taken and data protection law (which has since been enhanced via the introduction of GDPR) must be complied with. In particular, it is worth noting that the ICO requires a mandatory data privacy impact assessment if an employer intends to track an individual’s location or behaviour. (López Ribalda and others -v- Spain [2019] ECHR 752)

Hill Dickinson LLP - Jeff Middleton, Kerstie Skeaping, James Williams, Amy Millson and Luke Green
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • European Union
  • United Kingdom
  • Employment & Labor
  • IT & Data Protection
  • Litigation
  • Hill Dickinson LLP

Tagged with

  • GDPR
  • European Court of Human Rights

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Brexit: the impact on how personal data is protected *
  2. Brexit and public procurement: do any major changes come into effect on 1 January 2021 once the transition period expires? *
  3. Transforming public procurement: highlights of the Green Paper inviting consultation *
  4. Decarbonisation and Shipping: EU Emissions Trading Scheme *
  5. Want to carry out a secondary issue on the Main Market but avoid publishing a full prospectus? *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
loading...

Related topic hubs

  1. GDPR
  2. United Kingdom
  3. European Union
  4. IT & Data Protection
  5. Employment & Labor

Related European Union articles

  1. Human rights not violated by covert surveillance *
  2. Clarity on CCTV monitoring of employees *
  3. Covert monitoring employees by CCTV did not violate right to privacy *

Related international articles

  1. Covert CCTV at work. Is this ever possible? * - United Kingdom
  2. Worried about employee theft? ECHR sets out guidelines on covert surveillance * - United Kingdom
  3. Covert surveillance at work - a breach of the right to privacy? * - United Kingdom
Hanh T. Pham
Counsel, Intellectual Property
Global Downstream IP Team
What our clients say

"Love the service, really good quality articles in general."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research