• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Resources
  • Research
    • Legal research hub
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner: regulatory tracking
    • Lexy: powerful AI search
    • Research reports
    • Explore all
  • Research
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Legal research hub
  • Primary sources
  • Scanner: regulatory tracking
  • Lexy: powerful AI search
  • Research reports
  • Explore all
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

HRizon employment law newsletter - November 2019 | Hill Dickinson

Hill Dickinson LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

European Union, United Kingdom November 25 2019

In the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights

Did the use of covert CCTV to monitor workplace theft violate the employees’ right to privacy? Individuals have the right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. This right to privacy, and data protection principles, can both have an impact on the legality of any covert monitoring an employer undertakes. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) has recently considered whether the installation and use of covert CCTV in the workplace breached the privacy rights of workers because of its intrusive nature. The Grand Chamber was hearing a rare appeal from an earlier ECrtHR chamber decision. The case had been brought by five supermarket cashiers who argued that their employer’s installation of covert CCTV in the workplace had infringed their right to privacy. The supermarket had identified regular, large-scale stock discrepancies and installed CCTV surveillance cameras as part of its investigation. This included covert cameras filming the area behind the tills. The supermarket did not inform its staff that covert CCTV cameras had been installed (which it was obliged to do under Spanish data protection law). Five employees were recorded stealing and/or helping others to steal; they admitted theft and were dismissed. The Spanish domestic courts held those dismissals to be fair, and that the covert CCTV surveillance had been justified and proportionate. The employees successfully brought claims before the ECrtHR for breach of their right to privacy (the chamber decision). The employer successfully appealed to the Grand Chamber, which overturned the earlier chamber decision. The Grand Chamber held that the fact that the employer had not informed the employees that it had installed covert CCTV, as required by Spanish data protection law, was merely one factor to be taken into account; it was not determinative of whether the intrusion on their right to privacy was proportionate. In this case, the employees had a limited expectation of privacy on the shop floor, the duration of the period of monitoring was short, only a small number of people were permitted to see the covert footage, and warning the employees about the covert CCTV cameras could have jeopardised the investigation. Therefore, the Spanish courts had acted within their margin of discretion in holding the intrusion on their rights to privacy to be proportionate and their dismissals to be fair. However, while employers will welcome the Grand Chamber’s decision, it is important to appreciate that it does not mean routine use of covert CCTV in the workplace will always be acceptable. Human rights and data protection overlap in this area, but are separate bodies of law. If CCTV is used, privacy safeguards must be taken and data protection law (which has since been enhanced via the introduction of GDPR) must be complied with. In particular, it is worth noting that the ICO requires a mandatory data privacy impact assessment if an employer intends to track an individual’s location or behaviour. (López Ribalda and others -v- Spain [2019] ECHR 752)

Hill Dickinson LLP - Jeff Middleton, Kerstie Skeaping, James Williams, Amy Millson and Luke Green

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • European Union
  • United Kingdom
  • Employment & Labor
  • IT & Data Protection
  • Litigation
  • Hill Dickinson LLP

Laws

  • GDPR

Courts

  • European Court of Human Rights

Popular articles from this firm

  1. China’s new personal information privacy law is not simply a repeat of GDPR : some important nuances for business in China *
  2. Materials - unavailability and increasing costs: what is the contractual position? *
  3. Travel Newsletter - Winter 2016 *
  4. New guidance and model contract for public sector bodies buying complex data and technology services *
  5. New Standard Contractual Clauses are unlikely to be a silver bullet *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
Primary sources PRO
  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

    • View in Primary sources

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Remote working - minimising cybersecurity risks (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: Data subject access rights under the GDPR (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: Lawful processing of personal data under the GDPR (UK)

Related research hubs

  • GDPR
  • United Kingdom
  • European Union
  • Litigation
  • IT & Data Protection
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research