In Colon v. Bumble, Inc. et al., the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a provision in the charter of a Delaware corporation granting the company’s founder and financial sponsor high voting power within the same class of stock also issued to the public shareholders was valid under the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL). The provision, which, in simplified terms, provided that a share carried ten votes if held by the founder or sponsor (or anyone else party to a particular stockholder agreement), but only one vote if held by others, was consistent with longstanding Delaware precedent enforcing charter provisions providing for formula-based allocations of voting power. Because the DGCL permits voting rights to be made dependent upon “facts ascertainable” outside of the charter, such “identity-based voting” is permissible under Delaware law. This decision validates a structure that may be of particular interest to those companies seeking to go public with a high/low vote structure, as it allows the maintenance of voting control with only one class of registered, liquid shares, without the need for an illiquid second class of stock.


Bumble Inc.’s founder and its financial sponsor took the company public in 2021 using a relatively new structure that combined the benefits of an “Up-C” structure and a dual-class, high vote/low vote structure. In simplified terms, the company’s charter contemplated that each share of common stock would carry one vote, unless the share is owned by a “Principal Stockholder,” which under the definition included the company’s founder and its financial sponsor. The plaintiff argued that this sort of “identity-based voting” violated the DGCL, and the parties made cross motions for summary judgment.

Court’s Reasoning

In an opinion by Vice Chancellor Laster, the court held in favor of the company, founder and financial sponsor, reasoning that the voting structure complied with the DGCL under Delaware precedent enforcing charter provisions that allocated voting power using a formula or procedure.[1] Specifically, as required by Sections 102(a)(4) and 151(a) of the DGCL, the charter’s voting formula applied to all the shares in the class and specified how it is calculated. Moreover, as authorized by Section 151(a), the formula made the “quantum of voting power” of a share dependent on “facts ascertainable outside of the certificate of incorporation,” namely the identity of the owner.

The court also specifically addressed and rejected various of plaintiff’s arguments that the voting structure at issue was invalid:

The Bumble opinion therefore continues the line of Delaware decisions that make clear that a Delaware corporation can have a share structure that gives certain holders higher voting power.

* * *

[1] These included: Providence & Worcester Co. v. Baker, 378 A.2d 121 (Del. 1977) (upholding a scaled voting structure in which the number of votes appurtenant to a share varied depending upon the total number of shares that the owner held); Williams v. Geier, 1987 WL 11285 (Del. Ch. May 20, 1987) (dismissing a challenge to tenured voting); Sagusa v. Magellan Petroleum Corp., 1993 WL 512487 (Del. Ch. Dec. 1, 1993), aff’d, 650 A.2d 1306 (Del. 1994) (TABLE) (dismissing a challenge to a per capita voting provision where each stockholder received one vote regardless of how many shares of stock owned).

[2] The court cited Providence, 378 A.2d 121, Williams, 1987 WL 11285, and Sagusa, 1993 WL 512487, each as upholding formulas that applied identically across all shares, but generating different outcomes for particular shares.

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a provision in the charter of a Delaware corporation granting the company’s founder and financial sponsor high voting power within the same class of stock also issued to the public…

U.S. and global M&A activity was mixed in August compared to July but declined across the board year over year. Compared to July, both U.S. and global activity were up by total deal value (14% and 11%, respectively), but down more …

The DOJ recently appointed two veteran prosecutors as the first Chief Counsel and Deputy Chief Counsel for Corporate Enforcement in the National Security Division.

Thirteen prominent private equity transactional partners are joining the firm.

The proposed DOJ-FTC merger guidelines could in certain circumstances lead to challenges to deals that in the past would not have faced agency action. Two of the guidelines—one dealing with serial acquisitions and another dealing with …

Ravi Purohit is joining the firm as co-head of the Infrastructure Practice, resident in New York.

U.S. and global M&A activity fell in July by most measures compared to June. Total deal value was down 6% in the U.S. and 19% globally, while the number of deals fell 13% in the U.S. and 6% globally. Strategic activity was down,…

President Biden issued an executive order creating the first-ever U.S. outbound investment review mechanism.

Scott Sher has joined the firm as an Antitrust partner in Washington, D.C. Sher will advise clients on antitrust issues that arise in the M&A process and on antitrust investigations and competition issues.

Corporate partner Kyle Seifried will co-host a Strafford webinar, “Public Company M&A: Transaction Structures, Securities Compliance, Avoiding Shareholder Litigation,” examining different approaches to acquiring or merging with a…

Paul, Weiss received six recognitions across various categories in the International Tax Review’s 2023 Americas Tax Awards, which recognize the remarkable achievements and developments by tax professionals throughout the Americas over …

Paul, Weiss was recognized in two categories at the 2023 LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards.

Corporate partner Ted Ackerman is shortlisted for The M&A Advisor’s “Legal Advisor of the Year” award, which recognizes the most impressive U.S. legal professionals in M&A over the past year.

Paul, Weiss was named a finalist 10 times across various categories in The M&A Advisor’s 22nd Annual M&A Advisor Awards, which recognize outstanding transactions, deal teams and professionals from the past year.

Paul, Weiss is shortlisted for five awards in Asian Legal Business’s Hong Kong Law Awards 2023, which recognize the exceptional performance of private practitioners and in-house counsel in Hong Kong over the past year.

Corporate partner Andrew Krause was recognized as a Law360 2023 “Rising Star” in the Mergers & Acquisitions category.

Paul, Weiss is shortlisted in two categories in LMG Life Sciences’ 2023 LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards.

Paul, Weiss was recognized by LMG Life Sciences’ 2023 LMG Life Sciences EMEA Awards in the “Impact Deal of the Year” category for its work on General Electric’s spinoff of its health care business into GE HealthCare Technologies.

Paul, Weiss was recognized by the China Business Law Journal as an international law firm winner in seven award categories at the 2023 China Business Law Awards: “Dispute Resolution (Cross-Border)”; “M&A (Inbound and Domestic)”;…

Law360 has recognized four Paul, Weiss partners as 2023 Rising Stars.