On May 8, 2012 ALJ Pender issued an Initial Determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-814, Certain Automotive GPS Navigation Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, granting Complainant Beacon Navigation GMBH’s (“Beacon”) Motion to Terminate the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint. While no respondents opposed the motion, respondents Suzuki, Mercedes, Ford, Chrysler, Nissan, Honda, General Motors, Mazda, Jaguar, Toyota, Volvo, Hyundai, Kia and BMW requested that Beacon’s motion not be granted until they could investigate whether Beacon violated Rule 210.12(a)(9)(iii) and/or Rule 210.4(c), which relate to identification of licensees in a complaint and the certification of representations to the presiding administrative law judge, respectively. Respondents Audi and Volkswagen did not oppose Beacon’s motion. The Commission Investigative Staff supported the motion. ALJ Pender declined respondents’ request to delay termination of the investigation and denied any outstanding motions as moot.