The IP Court indicates in the decision of case No. 101-Shing-Zuan-Su-#47 that when the inventive step of a patent is challenged based on a plurality of evidence combinations in a patent invalidation case, TIPO should nonetheless consider the remaining evidence combinations in the substantive examination of the inventive step of said patent when a portion of the evidences are considered inadmissible.  It is unlawful that TIPO failed to examine said evidence combinations substantively for invalidation.