The UK government issued its latest 'white paper' on the future relationship between the UK and European Union yesterday (12 July). Apart from general statements on the importance of IP protections, it did not mention or specify plans for how IP rights would be managed post-Brexit, other than in regards to Geographical Indications (GIs) and, to a lesser extent, the Unitary Patent (UP).
On the former, it announced plans to establish its own GI scheme after exit; on the latter, it simply states that it ‘intends to explore’ staying in the Unified Patent Court and UP system after the UK leaves the EU (click here for more on the unitary patent).
What are GIs?
A GI is an indication that a product has a specific place of origin and that it is made to a certain quality/standard according to factors that are due to that origin, such as ingredients used, manufacturing process etc. Well-known examples include Champagne, Cognac, Parma ham, Feta cheese and, in the UK, Scotch whisky, Cumberland sausages and Cornish pasties.
Why are they important?
Some key advantages of the GI system, include:
- preventing registration of a product with a specific origin as a trademark by another party without the same heritage/manufacturing standards, which could lead to market/consumer confusion and dilution of the GI’s reputation and value;
- adding value to the product: A GI-protected product is often regarded as a premium product;
- protecting consumers by ensuring that only genuine GI products can be described as such; and
- helping to prevent the indication becoming a generic term, which in turn protects both legitimate producers and consumers.
It has been widely reported that the UK has come under pressure from the US to drop many of its GI terms as part of any possible future trade agreement, so that supermarkets can import American copies. Under EU law, GI products can only be marketed as such if they are made in a specific place of origin.
How does the EU system currently work?
The following categories of products can be protected in the EU as GIs:
- Wines under EC Regulation n°1234/20071, which incorporates EC Regulation 479/2008
- Spirits under EC Regulation n°110/2008
- Some agricultural and foodstuff products under EC Regulation 510/2006.
In all cases, member states are responsible for the prevention of unlawful use within the Community of protected geographical designations.
It can take up to four years to get the name of a food or drink product legally protected by the EU, and it is not a simple process. There are some distinctions of note between Protected Designations of Origin (PDOs) and Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs/GIs) under the regulations (for example, the raw materials must also come from the defined area for PDOs). Producers can also apply to protect a products as a Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG).
What is the UK proposing?
While the UK government’s recent white paper is light on details, it clearly states that the UK will be establishing its own GI scheme after exit, noting “GIs recognise the heritage and provenance of products which have a strong traditional or cultural connection to a particular place. They provide registered products with legal protection against imitation, and protect consumers from being misled about the quality or geographical origin of goods. Significant GI-protected products from the UK include Scotch whisky, Scottish farmed salmon, and Welsh beef and lamb.”
It goes on to add that: “This new UK framework will go beyond the requirements of [the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS)], and will provide a clear and simple set of rules on GIs, and continuous protection for UK GIs in the UK. The scheme will be open to new applications, from both UK and non-UK applicants, from the day it enters into force.”
As we have previously covered, the European Commission's Draft Withdrawal Agreement, issued at the end of February, would require the UK to introduce new legislation to protect GIs if it is to meet the provisions of the proposed agreement. This latest government white paper suggests it is planning on doing so, although it is not yet clear how.