In its recent decision in SEC v. Apuzzo, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that to prevail on a claim of aiding and abetting securities fraud under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the SEC need not demonstrate that the defendant’s conduct proximately caused the primary violation.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact email@example.comRegister
'Apuzzo' invites aiding and abetting securities fraud enforcement actions
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Related topic hubs
Head of Legal, Asia Pacific
"SCCA Newsstand is a great legal resource. I particularly like the user-friendly format, which I find highly efficient!"