• Login
  • Register
  • PRO
    • PRO Compliance plan
    • PRO Compliance
    • PRO subscription plans
    • Curated articles
    • In-depth
    • Market intelligence
    • Practice guides
    • PRO Reports New
    • Lexology GTDT
    • Ask Lexy
  • PRO
  • Latest
  • GTDT
  • Research
  • Learn
  • Experts
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Explore
  • Legal Research
  • Primary SourcesBeta
  • PRO Compliance

Introducing PRO Compliance
The essential resource for in-house professionals

  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre New

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates New

Lexology PRO

Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 

PRO Compliance plan
PRO subscription plans

Premium content

  • Curated articles
  • In-depth
  • Market intelligence
  • Practice guides
  • PRO Reports New

Analysis tools

  • Lexology GTDT
  • Ask Lexy
Explore all PRO content PRO Compliance
  • Find experts
  • About
  • Firms
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

The road ahead: what’s coming in the final months of the 113th Congress and the Lame Duck session

Dentons

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA September 3 2014

Energy

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) plans to revisit several energy and environmental measures in late September, including bills to: approve the Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline, block federal limits on carbon emissions from power plants and expand access to drilling offshore and on federal lands. This will require tough votes for Democratic House members. Energy issues will be important in states like Colorado, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana and West Virginia.

Senate Energy Committee Chair, Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA), recently joined Republicans to pass a bill out

of committee approving the KXL pipeline. Senate passage of that bill is unlikely, but it allows Landrieu to tout her pro-energy record, and her role as Chair of Energy serves to highlight issues on which she differs with the Obama Administration’s policies on

oil and gas. We expect Landrieu to hold more hearings on issues that will resonate in Louisiana: revenue sharing, energy production on federal lands and coastal restoration.

The Obama Administration will continue work on energy-related regulatory initiatives. In late August, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sent its final 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) to the Office

of Management and Budget (OMB) for a review that may be complete before Election Day. The Department of Energy finalized its new review process for applications to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) to non- Free Trade Act countries on August 14, and could soon approve several

pending applications. The Department of Commerce could act soon to clarify the Administration’s crude oil export policy by defining more clearly what qualifies as a refined product that falls outside the ban on exports.

Financial Services and Taxation

Tax Extenders. GOP lawmakers would like to pass “extenders”—bills to extend permanently some of more than 50 expired tax breaks—rather than just extend them for two years, as the Senate would prefer. House Republicans would like to renew the tax breaks in a piecemeal fashion, rather than accept the Senate’s approach of a comprehensive ex- tenders bill. They are at an impasse.

In April, the Ways and Means Committee favorably reported six separate bills—each to make

permanent an expiring tax provision. None of the six bills included revenue offsets. Democrats are calling for “pay-fors” to cover the costs of permanent extensions estimated

by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) at nearly $1 trillion in revenue

over the next 10 years. Three of the six stand-alone extenders bills have passed the House, with no prospect of consideration in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) attached the Senate extenders package—a two year extension of

the 50 expired tax breaks—to a bill addressing healthcare for veterans. The bill then stalled after Republican senators voted against moving forward, despite general support for the underlying veterans’ legislation. It is unlikely that any tax extenders legislation will become law this year.

Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA). The reauthorization of the TRIA, a program set to expire at the end of 2014, faces many hurdles

in the House. In July, the Senate passed a bipartisan seven year TRIA reauthorization bill (S. 2244) by a vote of 93-4, but the House did not take up its version of a TRIA reauthorization bill before the August recess. Prospects are increasing that the issue of TRIA’s reauthorization will not be resolved until the Lame Duck session after

the election.

The current version of S. 2244 has the support of the White House and would make only minor changes to the 2007 TRIA reauthorization. In contrast, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) has sought consistently to eliminate, or radically scale back, the TRIA program and the federal role in

terrorism insurance. Unable to do that, Hensarling has supported H.R. 4871,

a TRIA reauthorization bill favorably reported out of the committee by Republicans on June 20th on a party- line vote. H.R. 4871 would extend TRIA for five years, increase the insurer co- pay to 20 percent, raise the program’s trigger from $100 million to $500 million and bifurcate the program so that the federal share of coverage

for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological (NBCR) attacks would be greater than the federal share  of coverage for non-NBCR attacks.

House Democrats strongly support passage of S. 2244 and unanimously oppose H.R. 4871.

Corporate Tax Inversion. Controversy continues to grow over inversions—cross-border transactions in which a US firm merges with

an offshore entity to establish tax residency in a foreign country with a lower corporate tax rate. President Obama has called companies who do inversions “corporate deserters who renounce their citizenship to shield profits”. Democrats seek to pass stand-alone legislation to curb corporate inversions, while most Republicans believe that inversions should be addressed, if at all, only as part of a comprehensive tax reform proposal.

Various legislative proposals have been offered to limit or prevent the use of corporate inversions by raising

the foreign ownership threshold for the post-merger entity from 20 percent to 50 percent; broadening the ban on the award of federal contracts to inverted corporations or reducing the amount of interest inverted companies can deduct.

Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R-UT) believes that reform of the tax code is the only way to completely address inversions. He argues that any interim steps to address inversions must not be retroactive or punitive, should

be revenue neutral, must favor a territorial tax system and not impede progress toward comprehensive tax reform. There is no reason currently to believe that Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Ranking Member Hatch can agree on legislation that both the Senate and House would pass and the President would sign.

The President may use his executive authority to address corporate inversions as many Democrats have urged. It is unclear how much can be accomplished administratively.

The Treasury Department is now putting together a range of

administrative options for executive action that Secretary Jack Lew says would “change the economics of inversions” but has not yet identified any of the administrative options under consideration.

Health Care

A divided Congress and presidential veto threat will preclude the en- actment of any Affordable Care

Act (ACA)-related legislation when Congress returns to Washington.

It is unlikely that the appropriations fights of the past to defund the ACA will recur, apart from rhetoric and amendments with little chance of passage.

The ACA is certain to play a role in many close elections around the country (particularly in Senate races), however, the impact of the law on voters’ thinking is unlikely to reach 2010 or 2012 levels. Public opinion of the law has barely shifted since its enactment; the electorate substantially has turned to other issues.

The second annual open enrollment period will begin November 15, after the election. For the three month open enrollment period, the bulk of health reform activity will be directly related to the experiences of consumers

in open enrollment. Congress also has temporarily fixed the Medicare physician payment formula through March 31, 2015, avoiding the annual end-of-year scramble to enact Medicare legislation.

Immigration

More than a year after the US Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill, and despite the stream

of undocumented migrants from Central America, immigration reform remains stalled in Congress, where the House is expected to take no further action on a reform bill. President Obama has recently indicated that

he may use executive orders and agency action to affect changes in our immigration system. He is considering action to provide additional green cards for high-tech workers and

family members of US citizens and to forestall deportation for many undocumented immigrants currently in the US.

White House action on immigration is expected soon, following the failure of negotiations with Congress to pass a measure to address the recent surge of migrants from Central America. The president’s proposed $3.7 billion package to address the border crisis, and more modest measures from Republicans in Congress, fell victim

to the election politics of immigration, a particularly powerful issue in

states where key Senate races will be decided. The President’s likely executive actions will further roil the immigration debate. Republicans will cite it as executive overreach.

Immigration reform will not pass in this session of Congress, and the politics of the issue ensure that it will be difficult to pass next year.

FY 2015 Appropriations

Despite assent in Congress to the Murray-Ryan agreement—the bipartisan budget conference

agreement reached by Senate Budget Committee chairman Patty Murray

(D-WA) and House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI)—on a top line number of $1.014 trillion for all FY 2015 appropriations, Congress has sent none of its twelve appropriations bills to the President for his signature this year. The House has passed seven bills (Commerce, Justice-Science, Defense, Energy and Water, Financial Services, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Transportation-HUD), while the Senate has failed to pass even one, though Fiscal Year 2014 will expire on September 30, 2014.

Since Congress is likely to recess from late September through the election, it will almost certainly pass a “Continuing Resolution” (CR) to keep the government running from October 1, 2014 until mid- December 2014. This would allow

Congress to put together an omnibus appropriations bill, with all 12 spending bills in a single package, and send

it to the President in December. Or Congress could pass another CR during the Lame Duck session and tackle the 12 appropriations bills in early 2015, in the next Congress.

Telecommunications

Congress will continue work on the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2012 (STELA), which is slated to expire on December 31, 2014. In July, the House approved

a bipartisan 5-year extension of the Act, with some changes, including repeal of the set-top box integration ban, prohibiting broadcasters in the same market from joint retransmission consent negotiations, and repeal of rules prohibiting pay-TV providers  from blacking out broadcast signals during Neilson “sweeps weeks” periods.

On the Senate side, the Judiciary Committee has reported out a “clean” five year extension, without any of the video reforms that the House adopted. However, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Ranking Member John Thune (R-SD) recently released their “Local Choice”

bipartisan draft proposal. The Senate Commerce Committee would likely consider and report STELA legislation during September, with rumors of

a September 17th markup. Majority Leader Reid would prefer for the Senate to pass its STELA bill by unanimous consent. It remains to be seen whether the Local Choice proposal, or any of its components, moves forward with STELA.

The Internet Tax Freedom Act will expire on November 1, 2014. The House has voted for a permanent moratorium on state and local governments taxing access to the Internet. The Senate is considering a shorter-term 10 year extension, but Majority Leader Reid plans to attach the Marketplace Fairness Act, which would require online retailers to  collect sales tax. That bill passed the Senate last year. A Senate floor vote is possible in September or it could slip until November, following the election.

Cybersecurity

Congress made some progress on cybersecurity legislation this

Congress, but it is doubtful that any more cybersecurity legislation will pass the Senate before the elections. The House has passed numerous cybersecurity bills in this Congress, primarily codifying existing Federal cybersecurity programs, providing increased Federal research and development and enhancing cyber workforce training. However, the House-passed Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)

is seen as the most critical piece of legislation necessary to protect critical infrastructure against cyber threats.

CISPA was sponsored by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) and Ranking Member Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD) and passed the House in April 2013.

It provides for information sharing between the federal government and private sector, and provides liability protections for companies that share cyber threat information

with the government. CISPA has been criticized by privacy rights advocates.

The President has threatened to veto CISPA due to concerns about individual privacy.

Despite this controversy, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Ranking Member Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)

introduced a Senate companion bill to CISPA. Their bill, the Cyber Information Sharing Act of 2014 (CISA), was passed out of the Senate Intelligence Committee in July 2014, by a vote of

12-4. The Administration has raised privacy concerns, but has yet to threaten a veto.

Given the opposition by privacy rights groups and the Administration to the current House and Senate information sharing bills, it is unlikely that there

will be any action on either bill before the mid-term elections. After the elections, the prospects for Senate passage and eventually sending a bill to the President will improve but it is unclear if the Senate will allocate floor time for this legislation.

Export-Import Bank

The fate of the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) is in doubt. Its charter is set to expire at the end of September.

The agency provides loan guarantees and insurance to foreign companies purchasing US goods, but many Republicans lately have called for its dissolution, arguing that the bank represents corporate welfare and “crony capitalism.” In the past, the

Ex-Im Bank has enjoyed bipartisan support. Despite support for the bank’s reauthorization from influential business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce, it is possible that Ex-Im Bank’s charter could lapse on September 30.

In the Senate, a group of eight senators, led by Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL), introduced a bill that would reauthorize the bank for five years, while increasing reporting

requirements and boosting its lending

authority to $160 billion from $140 billion over a four-year period. The bank’s reauthorization is also a critical topic in many contentious Senate races including Iowa, North Carolina and Louisiana.

Some Republican members called for the committee to find a middle- ground on the bank’s renewal, and impose reforms that would rein in its lending capacities. Disagreement within House Republican ranks— and lawmakers facing tough reelection bids in districts with a stake in ExIm-financed exports— could provide critical leverage for

a short-term reauthorization. A short-term extension of three to six months also would provide time for House Republicans to organize a reform strategy and negotiate with the Senate, while preserving the

opportunity to take advantage of the potential Republican takeover of the Senate in January.

Election Outlook

While a week can be a lifetime in a campaign, our team understands the dynamics of the electoral battlefield in the competitive races and the trends at play in each. Trends can change, and “October Surprises” may dramatically alter the dynamics of a particular race. “Wave” elections may not become apparent until late

October. With congressional approval at historic lows, all incumbents face some peril from the electorate—in the current climate, some observers have already speculated that a Republican wave election is possible this year.

Republicans are virtually certain to hold the House, so the race for the Speaker’s gavel will be contested  only among Republicans after the election. The effects of the 2010 redistricting combined with the impacts of President Obama’s approval rating below 50 percent create a strong tailwind for House Republican candidate. Although most seats are contested, the number of truly competitive races in the House remains small, numbering in the dozens, with anywhere from eight to 12 “toss up” races for seats held by House Democrats and three to five for Republicans. In all, the universe of

competitive seats is less than a third of the Chamber.

Control of the Senate will be largely determined by races in several states that Republican presidential

nominee Mitt Romney carried in 2012.

districts shifts in 2016 where Senate Republicans will find themselves defending more vulnerable seats than will the Democrats. Political analysts

have suggested that should the Republicans gain the majority in the US Senate in 2014, their majority will be in peril in 2016.

Democrats in Alaska, Arkansas, North Carolina and Louisiana face very strong challengers. The atmospherics of this cycle and polling have consistently shown the challenge they face in these traditionally “red states.” The Democratic-held seats

in South Dakota, Montana and West Virginia already seem likely to see a party switch. Bucking the trend at the moment is Senator Mark Begich who holds a slim lead in Alaska. The reelection effort of Mark Udall in

Colorado also has national Democrats concerned, and the open seat long held by Democrat Tom Harkin in

Iowa has yielded a very tight race. Republicans find themselves closely watching the McConnell-Grimes race in Kentucky (where the Republican Leader remains favored to win but is facing a surprisingly strong challenge).

The outcome is uncertain in the Saxby

Current breakdown of Congressional districts

Competitive Senate races

WA

MT

VT   ME

Chambliss open seat in Georgia where Republican David Perdue and Democrat Michelle Nunn remain close in the polls.

Republicans require a pick up of six

OR

ID

WY

NV

UT            CO

ND

MN

SD                      WI

NE            IA

NH

NY            MA

MI                                   RI

PA          CT

IN   OH                      NJ

WV             DE

seats to gain the majority in the Senate               CA

KS          MO

KY            VA        MD

—although a majority in the Senate

TN

does not bestow complete control. In

A

Z                                     OK

NM                                    AR

today’s Senate, effective control and

the ability to pass bills comes with 60 votes. If Republicans take the Senate,

AK

TX

MS LA

AL

GA

NC SC

SC special

they will still need some Democratic votes to move important legislation. This is their best opportunity, because the electoral landscape dramatically Current breakdown of Congressional

FL

OK special

HI

Safe D  Likely D  Leans D   R to D  Toss-Up  No election  D to R    Leans R   Likely R   Safe R

Democrats

Toss-ups                                            Republicans

Dentons - John R. Russell IV, Michael E. Zolandz , Sander Lurie and Thomas F. Walls
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Public
  • Dentons

Tagged with

  • Liquefied natural gas

Popular articles from this firm

  1. How to handle a motion for sanctions *
  2. State and Local Taxes in Kentucky *
  3. Campaign finance in the US and the UK: a comparative assessment *
  4. Sales and use taxes in Kentucky *
  5. Corporate income and franchise taxes in Kentucky *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
loading...

Related research hubs

  • USA
  • Public
Dominic Cottam
Senior Counsel
BOC Limited
What our clients say

"As a busy in-house practitioner, I rarely have the time to attend formal seminars and conferences. Consequently, I find the news releases put out by the various law firms invaluable in keeping me up to date on developments in the law and recent case law. The service that Lexology provides, through consolidating those various news releases and grouping them under the relevant categories, is a timesaver for me and allows me to do a quick daily scan of recent developments."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research