In Revenue Procedure 2016-37, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) formally announced the elimination, effective January 1 2017, of the five-year remedial amendment cycle system for individually designed qualified retirement plans.(1) The IRS further announced that each year it will publish a Required Amendments List and an Operational Compliance List in place of the cumulative list of amendments that previously provided guidance on these plans. The first Required Amendments List was published in early December, providing an opportunity to develop procedures for maintaining qualified status in 2017 and beyond.
This update discusses some resources and considerations that may help to inform employers in such actions as plan sponsor.
The recently published Required Amendments List in IRS Notice 2016-80 includes a single amendment that is potentially applicable only to certain defined benefit plans. This brevity highlights both the scope and limitations of the Required Amendments List.
The IRS has stated that the Required Amendments List is intended to include statutory and administrative changes in qualification requirements that are first effective during the calendar year in which the list is published.(2) In general, plans must be amended for such requirements within the remedial amendment period – this is no later than the end of the second calendar year which begins after the issuance of the Required Amendments List in which the change in qualification requirements appears (ie, with respect to the recently published Required Amendments List, December 31 2018).
The Required Amendments List is not intended to include the following:
- statutory changes in qualification requirements for which the Treasury Department and the IRS expect to issue guidance (which could be included on the Required Amendments List in the future);
- changes in qualification requirements that permit (but do not require) optional plan provisions; or
- changes in the tax laws affecting qualified plans that do not change the qualification requirements per se, such as changes to funding requirements.
This suggests that, while the Required Amendments List can serve as the starting point for determining whether any plan amendments are required, it should not be treated as definitive. Rather, employers will need to undertake a more extensive review of a given plan's terms in the context of existing legal rules. However, not all amendments listed on the Required Amendments List will be appropriate for every plan. The responsibility for determining whether and when an amendment is required will continue to rest with the plan sponsor.
Although it has yet to do so, the IRS stated that it intends to publish the Operational Compliance List annually, to identify changes in qualification requirements that are first effective during a calendar year. While this may assist employers in achieving operational compliance with such changes, the IRS has further stated that a plan must continue to comply operationally with respect to each relevant qualification requirement, even if the requirement is not included on the Operational Compliance List. The absence of the Operational Compliance List in 2016 does not relieve plan sponsors of current responsibility for operational review of their qualified plans and, where appropriate, operational changes.
Operational changes may be required immediately (ie, before the end of the remedial amendment period for any corresponding plan amendment which permits retroactive adoption). The resulting period between required operational and required documentary compliance can extend a year or more, so employers should develop strategies for ensuring consistency between plan operations and the required terms of the amendments that memorialise them.
Determination letters issued before January 4 2016 included automatic expiration dates which are no longer operative. Instead, the IRS has stated that plan sponsors that maintain a qualified plan for which a favourable determination letter has been issued and that are otherwise entitled to rely on the determination letter may not continue to rely on the determination letter with respect to a plan provision that is subsequently amended or subsequently affected by a change in law. However, a plan sponsor may continue to rely on a determination letter with respect to plan provisions that are not amended or affected by a change in law.
Although the ability to rely on an existing determination letter is therefore limited, it is nonetheless significant. In order to maximise the available reliance, employers may wish to:
- preserve the version of the plan document for which the most recent determination letter was issued, so that any subsequent amendments can be clearly identified;
- weigh stylistic revisions to the plan document (whether via amendment or restatement) against their potential impact on reliance; and
- consider the desired reliance on the existing plan document when drafting future amendments ? for example, in assessing which sections to amend and how best to do so.
For further information on this topic please contact Joanne C Youn or Ronald G Cluett at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered by telephone (+1 202 862 5000) or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered website can be accessed at www.caplindrysdale.com.
(1) Individually designed plans in Cycle A (those with plan sponsors whose employer identification numbers end in 1 or 6) have a final opportunity to submit a request for an advance determination letter in the Cycle A submission period ending January 31 2017.
This article was first published by the International Law Office, a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. Register for a free subscription.