The Sentencing Council has opened consultation to review the sentencing guidelines for corporate manslaughter and other health and safety offences. This is the result of increasing dissatisfaction with the lack of comprehensive guidance regarding sentencing when it comes to fatal health and safety offences and corporate manslaughter.

The Council proposes to create a more consistent approach to sentencing for both fatal health and safety offences and corporate manslaughter, given their close interplay. Accordingly, large organisations committing corporate manslaughter could face tougher fines of up to £20 million in England and Wales. Fatal health and safety offences could also carry fines of up to £10 million. Notably, the Council has no legislative powers, so guidelines must fit within current legal limits. 

In 2013/14, there were 133 cases of fatal injuries at work while 70 members of the public were injured in work-related accidents. However, only four convictions for corporate manslaughter have been secured since the inception of the Corporate Manslaughter Act 2007:

  • Sterecycle waste firm was fined £500,000 after an employee died in an explosion whilst at work;
  • Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings in Gloucestershire was ordered to pay £385,000 after an employee was killed by a collapsing trench;
  • Prince's Sporting Club was ordered to pay £135,000 after an 11-year old girl died falling from a boat ride; and
  • Drumdollagh Construction Company was told to pay out £60,000 after a worker died in a truck incident. The fine was never paid as the company became insolvent.

The size of the fines imposed will be, to some extent, dependent upon a company’s financial means. Therefore, the small size of the above named businesses and their limited ability to pay large fines (for instance, due to being in administration) has meant that the fines imposed by courts have been relatively low so far. It is hoped that, in the future, fine levels would be large enough to have an economic impact on an organisation to stress the importance of operating in a safe environment. 

The Council proposes that, from now on, starting points and ranges for fines should be set out in guidelines, taking into consideration the offenders means and the seriousness of the offence to ensure: "proportionate sentences." Current guidelines are too vague by not setting upper limits for fines or starting points based on the size of the company involved, which results in organisations being under penalised. While these guidelines only apply to England and Wales, it is likely that Scottish judges will pay close attention to the guidance being set.

Michael Caplan QC, a member of the Sentencing Council, commented:
 
“We want to ensure that these crimes don’t pay. They can have extremely serious consequences, and businesses that put people at risk by flouting their responsibilities are undercutting those that play by the rules and do their best to keep people safe…Our proposals will help ensure a consistent approach to sentencing, allowing fair and proportionate sentences across the board, with some of the most serious offenders facing tougher penalties. We want to make sure it is clear that it will be cheaper to comply with the law than break it. This is a consultation: we want people to give us their views on our proposals so sentencing in this area is fair, effective and proportionate.”
 
For further detail, please click here.