Effective tax rate (ETR) planning is critical for all multinational enterprises.  From a business flow standpoint, supply chain efficiency is critical.  When ETR planning and supply chain rationalization are combined, there is a fascinating range of issues under scrutiny by tax authorities in all countries.


Deriving maximum cost efficiency from the supply chain is a critical operational issue for multinational enterprises (MNEs) in many regions.  MNE groups continuously seek to derive maximum cost efficiency from their design, production, distribution, servicing, administrative and other functions.  Because taxation is typically one of a group’s largest costs, supply chain structuring and restructuring processes typically include tax savings as an essential element of the overall process.

Successful supply chain rationalizations inevitably involve a rationalization of the functions and risks performed by affiliates in the supply chain.  They also involve an increase or decrease in such functions and risks performed in each country pertinent to the planning in question.  When a function or risk is moved from one affiliate to another, questions regarding valuation of the transferred assets or functions are likely to be raised.  Tax authorities in each country affected by supply chain rationalization are vigilant in protecting their domestic tax base, and scrutinize transactions to determine whether the functions or risks of domestic companies are restructured in a manner consistent with arm’s length criteria.

While the specific issues to be addressed depend upon the facts and circumstances of each situation, the illustration below is intended to facilitate a discussion of such points.


JCo is a Japanese parent of a group of companies engaged in the development, production, distribution and servicing of Unique Products.  Its traditional supply chain process involves Unique Products being produced entirely in its Chinese factories, then sold to affiliates around the world for distribution and servicing.  The competitive situation for Unique Products is intense, with JCo having many global competitors.

Because China can be a high-cost country, JCo is considering moving production of all component parts of Unique Products to Southeast Asia countries outside of China.  JCo has inquired about the valuation, financial accounting, transfer pricing and potential tax authority controversy matters relating to its evolving plans.

Click here to view diagram.

At the present time, the supply chain process of Unique Products is as follows, including an overall comparison to JCo’s competitors, which have already undertaken material steps to decentralize their supply chains to drive costs out of their systems and perform critical functions in low-tax countries:

Click here to view table.

The supply chain restructuring, at a minimum, should reduce the unit cost disadvantage. In the context of the illustration, the following functions or risks have been transferred:

Click here to view table.

Issues to Be Addressed

  • Valuation of the assets (including “soft” assts), functions, risks or liabilities transferred, which will depend in part on the form of the restructuring transaction, e.g., sale, license, assignment, contribution or otherwise (valuations can be important for tax and book purposes)
  • The financial accounting implications of valuations in all pertinent countries (including impairments or change from domestic to International Financial Reporting Standards)
  • Transfer pricing considerations to be received by the transferor entity, or the entity that loses the function/risk in question (the focus of tax authorities is reflected in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Transfer Pricing Guideline 2010 amendments for business restructurings and proposed changes relating to intangible transfers) 
  • Documentation
  • Planning
  • Advance resolutions (unilateral or bilateral, advance pricing agreements or otherwise) in Japan, China or other countries
  • Attorney-client privilege
  • Income tax planning
  • Customs, duty or consumption taxes
  • Advance resolution of transfer pricing, income tax or other issues
  • Tax authority examination preparation and handling in each potential country
  • Dispute resolution via domestic procedures, bilateral competent authority or domestic litigation