We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Keays v. Honda Canada Inc. revisited

Dentons

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Canada May 12 2009

The Supreme Court of Canada decision of Keays v. Honda Canada Inc.1 represents an important step towards clarifying the nature of damages recoverable upon the termination of employment.

Dentons - Carman J. Overholt, Q.C., Dana F. Hooker and Matthew Curtis
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Canada
  • Employment & Labor
  • Litigation
  • Dentons

Tagged with

  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Termination of employment
  • Nature
  • Honda Canada Inc.

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Sham investigation results in C$75,000 aggravated damages award against employer *
  2. "Best efforts" - "reasonable efforts" - "commercially reasonable efforts" - what do these terms mean? *
  3. On what basis can a secured lender refuse consent to a disposal when its consent is "not to be unreasonably withheld"? *
  4. Director compensation limits and considerations *
  5. Limitation of liability: consequential or indirect loss *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. Supreme Court of Canada
  2. Canada
  3. Employment & Labor
  4. Litigation

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Pensions & Benefits

  1. Canada
  2. Mexico
  3. Italy
  4. More...
Thomas Grozinger
Principal Trust Specialist
RBC Wealth Management
What our clients say

"Lexology is a great service, providing easy access to a variety of relevant articles from a number of information providers across different geographical zones -- I just wanted to say thank you to all who are involved in providing this reference!"

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group