Key Points:

CAC entities will need to begin reviewing their own governance to ensure they are ready for the 1 July 2014 commencement of the PGPA Act obligations.

A new regime establishing a uniform set of duties for Commonwealth entities, including CAC authorities, will be in force from 1 July 2014.

The Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth) (PGPA Act) will replace the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (Cth) (FMA Act) and Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (Cth) (CAC Act) with a principles-based regime.

For CAC Act authorities and their accountability authorities, this will mean new general duties and a need to review their own governance. CAC Act companies directors will continue to be bound by the directors' duties referenced in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as well as other reporting duties in the PGPA.

Who are officials?

A range of general duties apply directly to all officials of a Commonwealth entity. This encompasses all individuals who are or who form part of the Commonwealth entity, including members of the accountable authority, officers and employees (but generally not consultants, independent contractors, or the Minister). The Act contemplates a carve-out of classes of individuals by rules, but these have not yet been made.

Until the rules are made, therefore, this is a wide class of persons, including people who are directors and senior officers of the entity, or even a mere employee of the present CAC Act entity.

Underpinning the PGPA Act is a policy that the resources held and managed by various types of Commonwealth entities are inherently public in nature and should be managed to the same standards of accountability, reporting and control.

For officers under the CAC Act, the PGPA Act's duties will look very familiar, as they are similar in title to those duties imposed by the CAC Act and based on the general duties of officers under sections 180-184 and 191 of the Corporations Act 2001. This alignment in duties results in greater consistency in the duties required of officers across the public and private sectors.

In principle the additional duties largely duplicate existing duties in the APS Code of Conduct, which APS employees are already obliged to comply with. Thus the additional duties align previous CAC Act employee obligations with FMA Agency employee obligations.

General duties of accountable authorities

Under the PGPA Act, the "accountable authority" for a body corporate established by a Commonwealth law, is the governing body of the entity, unless otherwise prescribed by the rules. In essence the governing body is the board of directors of the entity. In the case of a Department of State or a Parliamentary Department, the accountable authority is the Secretary of the Department. Thus the overarching duties that apply to the leadership of a department and previous CAC Act agency have been aligned.

Accountable authorities continue to have similar obligations under the PGPA Act to those imposed on directors under the CAC Act in respect of planning and budgeting; reporting; accounts and records; financial records and auditing; banking and investment; and the establishment of an audit committee. However there is also new focus on performance. Consequently, accountable authorities will have a new duty to measure, assess and report on the Commonwealth entity's performance against achieving its purposes. This will add another dimension to the accountable authorities' existing focus and obligations.

The accountable authority takes on additional general duties which relate to its role in managing the entity and setting its strategic focus, including:

A duty to govern the entity in a way that promotes:

  • the proper use and management of public resources for which the entity is responsible;
  • the achievement of the purposes of the entity; and
  • the financial sustainability of the entity.

A duty to establish and maintain systems relating to risk and control (including by implementing measures directed at ensuring officials of the entity comply with the finance law).

A duty to encourage co-operation with others to achieve common objectives, where practicable; and

A duty, when imposing requirements on others in relation to the use or management of public resources for which the accountable authority is responsible, to take into account the risks associated with that use or management; and the effects of imposing those requirements.

The duties of an official who is a member of the accountable authority (eg. a director/senior manager) would be an amalgamation of the officials' duties and the accountable authorities duties.

How can a CAC entity's accountable authority fulfil the PGPA Act duties?

Thus to meet the governance requirement for an accountable authority, officials who are members of the accountable authority should:

  • maintain appropriate and effective decision-making and approvals processes in relation to the use of resources;
  • have appropriate processes in place to ensure oversight over project and program line areas in their use of resources and to address inappropriate use of resources by officials;
  • take medium and long-term (as well as short-term) considerations into account when undertaking planning and budgeting with a view to more efficient and effective financial management over the longer term;
  • consider whether the Commonwealth entity's objectives overlap with other stakeholders (such as other Commonwealth entities, and other public and private bodies and organisations) and if so whether and how it would be beneficial and practical to work together with those other stakeholders to achieve the common objectives;
  • establish and maintain policies and business processes for identifying, measuring, managing and reporting risks;
  • assess the risks in relation to the public resources provided to others through procurement and grant processes (such as service providers and grant recipients) and impose obligations on recipients which are proportionate to the risks; and
  • ensure that the responsibility for compliance and risk assessment and management is appropriately allocated, and any innovation and risk-taking does not undermine proper use and management of public resources.

Sanctions

Unlike the CAC Act and FMA Act, with one exception, the PGPA Act does not contain penalties and sanctions. The intention was to avoid duplicating penalty provisions in existing legal arrangements and legislation, such as the Public Service Act 1999, the Criminal Code Act 2005 and the Crimes Act 1914.

The only sanction in the PGPA Act is the termination of the appointment of a member of an accountable authority for breach of the general duties of an official under the PGPA Act. This approach to sanctions reduces the possibility of inconsistent sanctions and a person being penalised twice for the same action or omission. However entities will need to be aware of what the sanction or penalty is for a corresponding act or omission in the existing legal arrangements.

Getting your CAC entity ready for the PGPA Act

As noted above, further detail on classes to be covered by the PGPA Act will be included in rules to be issued by the Finance Minister.

These rules will probably deal with several issues relevant to directors' duties, which were previously addressed in the CAC Act, but are not in the PGPA Act (indeed some are specifically flagged as to be dealt with under the rules). These include the business judgement rule, reliance on information provided by others, the extent of responsibility for the actions of delegates, further detail about handling material personal interest, and indemnity and insurance for officials.

Until the rules are made, CAC entities will not have a full picture of their duties under the PGPA Act. Nonetheless, they should begin reviewing their own governance to ensure they are ready for the 1 July 2014 commencement of the PGPA Act obligations.