• TILA: court invalidated lender’s security interest in borrower’s residence where (i) lender had borrower sign release of right of rescission before expiration of rescission period, and (ii) lender did not provide borrower two copies of notice of right of rescission - Fisher Harris v. Schonbrun, No. 3:12-cv-488-J-MCR (M.D. Fla. Sept. 13, 2013) (ordering rescission conditioned upon repayment of benefit)
  • TILA: although lender’s security interest invalidated for TILA violations, borrower required to repay lender full benefit received where borrower did not attempt rescission until after lender filed foreclosure, almost two years after expiration of right to rescind - Fisher Harris v. Schonbrun, No. 3:12-cv-488-J-MCR (M.D. Fla. Sept. 13, 2013) (ordering rescission conditioned upon repayment of benefit)