• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

HSR Act Filing Threshold, Civil Penalty Maximum, and Interlocking Directorate Threshold Revisions
Blog Global Private Equity Watch

Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA January 29 2018

On January 26, 2018, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revisions to the jurisdictional thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act), which will become effective on February 28, 2018 and apply to transactions consummated on or after the effective date. The HSR Act requires the FTC to revise the thresholds annually based on changes in the gross national product. Under the revisions, the size of transaction threshold has been increased from $80.8 million to $84.4 million. Consequently, the HSR Act notification and waiting requirements will now apply to acquisitions resulting in the acquiring person holding assets and/or voting securities of the acquired person valued in excess of $84.4 million. The HSR Act requirements also will apply to purchases of partnership interests and membership interests of a limited liability company provided that (i) the acquiring person obtains control and (ii) the interests held by the acquiring person are valued in excess of $84.4 million. Acquisitions that do not exceed $337.6 million in value (previously $323 million) also have to meet the size of person threshold to trigger the HSR Act requirements. Under the revisions, the size of person threshold generally will be met if one of the parties has total assets or annual net sales of $168.8 million or more (previously $161.5 million) and the other party has total assets or annual net sales of $16.9 million or more (previously $16.2 million). In addition, acquisitions that result in the ownership of less than 50 percent of the outstanding voting securities of a corporation require HSR notification when certain dollar thresholds are reached. Under the revisions, a premerger filing is now required for such acquisitions when the value of the total voting securities acquired and held reaches each of the following dollar thresholds: (a) $84.4 million, (b) $168.8 million, (c) $843.9 million and/or (d) 25 percent of an issuer’s outstanding voting securities if valued in excess of $1.6878 billion. Antitrust/Competition Alert Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP January 29, 2018 2 Summary of threshold changes: Original Threshold 2018 Adjusted threshold $10 million $16.9 million $50 million $84.4 million $100 million $168.8 million $200 million $337.6 million $500 million $843.9 million $1 billion $1.6878 billion The HSR Act filing fee thresholds also have been revised as shown in the following chart. Transaction Valued at: HSR Act Filing Fee More than $84.4 million but less than $168.8 million $45,000 $168.8 million or more but less than $843.9 million $125,000 $843.9 million or more $280,000 Revisions to Maximum Civil Penalty for HSR Violations The FTC also has revised the maximum civil penalty for HSR Act violations. Such maximum civil penalties, which became effective January 22, 2018, increased from $40,654 per day to $41,484 per day. The FTC is required to revise the maximum civil penalty for annual inflation adjustments. The increased maximum will apply to civil penalties assessed after the effective date, including violations that predate the effective date, but does not change penalties already assessed or enforced penalties that the FTC is actively collecting. Revisions in Thresholds for Section 8 of the Clayton Act Finally, the FTC has revised the thresholds for interlocking directorates prohibited by Section 8 of the Clayton Act, which became effective January 29, 2018. The FTC is required to revise the Section 8 thresholds annually based on changes in the gross national product. Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits, with certain exceptions, one person serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if certain thresholds are met. As revised, Section 8 now covers situations where each corporation has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating $34,395,000 or more, unless either corporation has competitive sales of less than $3,439,500. Further information regarding these revisions to the HSR Act thresholds, the maximum civil penalty for HSR violations, and interlocking directorate thresholds are available on the FTC website. Please click here for the Revised Transaction Thresholds for Premerger Notification Filings and Interlocking Directorates. The Revised Civil Penalty Maximums are available here. If you have questions concerning the contents of this issue, or would like more information about Weil’s Antitrust/Competition practice group, please speak to your regular contact at Weil, or to: Vadim Brusser View Bio [email protected] +1 202 682 7224 Michael Naughton View Bio [email protected] +1 212 310 8754 © 2018 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. All rights reserved. Quotation with attribution is permitted. This publication provides general information and should not be used or taken as legal advice for specific situations that depend on the evaluation of precise factual circumstances. The views expressed in these articles reflect those of the authors and not necessarily the views of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. If you would like to add a colleague to our mailing list, please click here. If you need to change or remove your name from our mailing list, send an email to [email protected]

Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP - Vadim M. Brusser and Michael C. Naughton

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Corporate Finance/M&A
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

Organisations

  • Federal Trade Commission (USA)

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Looking Ahead to the 2023 Proxy Season: ISS Annual Policy Survey Targets Climate Risk - Board Oversight in Focus *
  2. The 2021 Annual CFIUS Report Shows the Committee’s Ability to Review More Transactions with Improved Timelines *
  3. The Supposed Hierarchy of “Efforts” Clauses *
  4. Recent Developments at the Intersection of Bankruptcy and Environmental Law *
  5. Defining “Material”—What Matter Will Matter? *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

More from Global Private Equity Watch

  1. When Does “And” Mean “Or”?
  2. The Supposed Hierarchy of “Efforts” Clauses
  3. COVID-19 and Lease Obligations: Does a Force Majeure Clause Override the Frustration of Purpose Doctrine?
  4. The Latest Word on Fee-Shifting Pursuant to an Indemnification Provision
  5. One of the Perils of 50/50 Ownership and Control: A Vague Standard for Determining the Validity of Board Actions Legally Taken but Alleged to Have Had an “Inequitable Purpose”

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to develop a vulnerability disclosure program (VDP) for your organization to ensure cybersecurity (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to assess competition law risks in an agency agreement (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: Understanding antitrust and unfair trade practices law and your organization’s compliance obligations (USA)

Related research hubs

  • Federal Trade Commission (USA)
  • USA
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Corporate Finance/M&A
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research