A concentration of undertakings is deemed to be of major importance and meet the jurisdictional thresholds set out in the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings Law 83(I) of 2014 (the Law) where:
- the aggregate turnover achieved by at least two of the undertakings concerned exceeds, (in relation to each one of them) €3.5 million;
- at least two of the undertakings concerned achieve a turnover in Cyprus; and
- at least €3.5 million of the aggregate turnover of all undertakings concerned is achieved in Cyprus.
The Cypriot merger control framework is applicable to transactions resulting in a permanent change of control. These include:
- mergers of two previously independent undertakings or parts thereof; and
- acquisitions by one or more persons already controlling at least one undertaking (directly or indirectly) of control of one or more other undertakings (whether by purchase of securities or assets, by agreement or otherwise).
Joint ventures performing all functions of an autonomous economic entity in a permanent manner are caught by the Law.
In alignment with European Union law, Cyprus law requires that a joint venture performs on a lasting basis all the functions of an autonomous economic entity for it to be considered a concentration.
A joint venture that is genuinely fully functional must be able to operate independently of its parents in an identifiable market.
In order to do so the joint venture must have a management dedicated to its day-to-day operations and access to sufficient resources including finance, staff, and assets (tangible and intangible) to be able to conduct its business activities on a lasting basis.
Supply relationship with parent companies
Establishing full functionality of a joint venture may prove particularly challenging where it only takes over one specific function within the parent companies' business activities, without the joint venture having its own access to or presence in the market.
The strong presence of parent companies in upstream / downstream plays a crucial role in assessing the full functionality of a joint venture, where this presence results in substantial sales or purchases between the parents and the joint venture.
Given that the basic function of an outsourcing joint venture is normally to supply the parent, the essential question is whether, regardless of these sales, the joint venture is able to play an active role in the market.
The joint venture's full functionality will not normally be affected by an initial period of sales exclusively to its parents.
Indeed, such a start-up period may be necessary in order to establish the joint venture in a market. The joint venture should inevitably have sufficient resources to build up such market presence within a reasonable time frame.
Where sales from a joint venture to the parent companies are intended to be made on a lasting basis, the essential question is whether, regardless of these sales, the joint venture is geared to play an active role in the market and can be considered economically autonomous from an operational viewpoint.
In this respect, the relative proportion of sales made to its parents compared with the total production of the joint venture is an important factor.
Unlike cases of acquisition of sole control, joint control is characterised by a deadlock situation resulting from the power of two or more parent companies to reject proposed strategic decisions of the joint venture.
As clearly illustrated by the Commission’s decisional practice and as is expressly stated in the Jurisdictional Notice, for a joint venture to be a full-function undertaking and therefore economically autonomous from an operational viewpoint, the joint venture does not have to be autonomous as regards the adoption of its strategic decisions.
Access to the market
Management, employees and financing resources are crucial in this discussion. A joint venture may be considered full-function even if it does not own the resources that it needs in order to operate on the market, provided it has sufficiently firm access to such resources.
In Eastman Kodak/Sun Chemical the joint venture was initially established for a period of ten years, but this was found to be on a lasting basis as there were automatic options to renew the agreement for further periods of five years.
It is therefore clear that joint ventures performing all functions of an autonomous economic entity in a permanent manner are caught under the Cypriot merger control regime. Where the jurisdictional thresholds are met, such joint ventures must be notified to and cleared by the Cyprus Commission for the Protection of Competition (“CPC”) prior to their implementation. The CPC may impose fines reaching up to 10% of the annual turnover of the undertakings concerned for implementation prior to notification and clearance.