We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Supreme Court of Canada to rule on whether ISPs can be regulated under the Broadcasting Act

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Canada June 28 2011

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has granted leave to appeal a Federal Court of Appeal judgment dated 7 July 2010, which held that internet service providers (ISPs) do not carry on a "broadcasting undertaking" as defined in the federal Broadcasting Act.

Baker McKenzie - Theodore Ling, Arlan Gates, Brian Cacic and Daniel Zatzman
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • Canada
  • Internet & Social Media
  • Litigation
  • Media & Entertainment
  • Baker McKenzie

Tagged with

  • ISP
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Broadcasting
  • Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
  • Broadcasting Act (1991)

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training Comes To New York *
  2. New obligation for Spanish companies to disclose their ultimate beneficial owners *
  3. Russia Proposes Harsh New Counter-Sanctions *
  4. The Crypto Valleys: The Regulatory Battle to Become the Global Hub of ICOs *
  5. Take A Break To Remember Your Meal And Rest Period Obligations Under California Law *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. Supreme Court of Canada
  2. Canada
  3. Media & Entertainment
  4. Litigation

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Arbitration

  1. Canada
  2. Hong Kong
  3. Bulgaria
  4. More...
David Bartlett
Senior Vice President & Counsel
GE Capital Aviation Services
What our clients say

"The content and quality of the newsfeeds is very good and well indexed by subject making it easy to follow up on."

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group