We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Australia - New legislation introduces ban on excessive card payment surcharges

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Australia October 11 2017

From 1 September 2017, all businesses which operate in Australia or which utilise an Australian bank will be prohibited from charging customers excessive surcharges for making payments using EFTPOS, MasterCard, Visa and American Express. The purpose of this ban is to ensure that businesses do not recover more than the applicable costs of accepting card payments from consumers. The ban excludes payment methods such as BPAY, PaylPal, Diners Club, American Express cards issued directly by American Express, cash and cheques. The Competition and Consumer Amendment (Payment Surcharges) Act 2016 inserts a new Part into the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), and operates alongside interchange fee standards set by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). The RBA's standards indicate that a surcharge will be considered excessive when it exceeds the permitted cost of acceptance, in other words the external cost incurred by a business in accepting that payment type, including merchant service fees and any rental and maintenance fess for payment card terminals. Whilst the costs of accepting a card payment will vary depending on the card type, if businesses want to set a single card surcharge the new law requires that this amount be set at the lowest cost of acceptance rather than the cost averaged out over multiple payment methods. The new law further grants the ACCC powers to enforce the ban and serves to remind Australian businesses to take a close look at their surcharging practices. The ACCC may issue surcharge information notices requiring a business to furnish evidence of the actual costs incurred for accepting a particularly payment method. If the ACCC believes on reasonable grounds that a business has breached the ban, it can issue infringement notices or bring court proceedings to seek pecuniary penalties. The ACCC media release is available here. The ACCC guide for businesses on payment surcharges is available here.

Baker McKenzie - Anne-Marie Allgrove, Toby Patten, Grace Loukides, Candice Colman and Rowena Baer
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • Australia
  • Banking
  • Company & Commercial
  • Baker McKenzie

Tagged with

  • ACCC
  • Reserve Bank of Australia
  • Payment card
  • MasterCard
  • American Express

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Is Your Dismissed Employee Entitled to a Bonus? *
  2. New obligation for Spanish companies to disclose their ultimate beneficial owners *
  3. The Crypto Valleys: The Regulatory Battle to Become the Global Hub of ICOs *
  4. Russia Proposes Harsh New Counter-Sanctions *
  5. The Pros and Cons of Bilateral and Multilateral Trade Agreements *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. ACCC
  2. Australia
  3. Company & Commercial
  4. Banking

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Patents

  1. Australia
  2. United Arab Emirates
  3. Germany
  4. More...
Monique Greene
Corporate Counsel
Powershop
What our clients say

“I enjoy the CLANZ newsstand and find it highly relevant to my job. I definitely have forwarded various articles to my colleagues on occasion where there is a point of general interest, particularly employment or IT law. I really appreciate the service, it's a quick way for me to keep up to date in a way I wouldn't otherwise have time to.”

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group