We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

A new framework for the policy owners' protection schemes

WongPartnership LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Singapore May 31 2011

The new Deposit Insurance and Policy Owners' Protection Schemes Act 2011 ("Act") was passed by Parliament on 11 April 2011.

WongPartnership LLP - Choon Yuen Hui
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Singapore
  • Insurance
  • WongPartnership LLP

Tagged with

  • Deposit insurance

Popular articles from this firm

  1. A court must examine the entire factual matrix of the case to determine if the facts show that the beneficiary of an on-demand performance bond had acted unconscionably and without good faith when making a call on the demand, and if it had, the court woul *
  2. Thanakharn Kasikorn Thai Chamkat (Mahachon) v Akai Holdings Ltd (in liquidation) *
  3. Pearson & Ors v Lehman Brothers Finance SA & Ors [2010] EWHC 2914 (CH) (England, High Court, 19 November 2010) *
  4. Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 (England, Court of Appeal, 14 February 2013) *
  5. Grupo Hotelero Urvasco SA v Carey Value Added SL & Anor [2013] EWHC 1039 (Comm) (England, High Court, 26 April 2013) *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. Singapore
  2. Insurance

Related Singapore articles

  1. Parliament passes Deposit Insurance and Policy Owners' Protection Schemes Bill 2011: strengthening protection of depositors and policy owners *
  2. Parliament introduces Deposit Insurance and Policy Owners' Protection Schemes Bill 2011: strengthening protection of depositors and policy owners *
  3. MAS issues regulations for implementation details of Policy Owners' Protection Scheme *

Related international articles

  1. Belgian Act implementing partially DGSD 201449EU enters into force * - Belgium
  2. The tenancy deposit scheme * - United Kingdom
  3. Proposed FDIC regulation would add new burden * - USA

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions:Insurance & Reinsurance

  1. Brazil
  2. Turkey
  3. Sweden
  4. View more
Nadia Martel
Senior Legal Counsel
C2MI
What our clients say

" I am very pleased with the content of the Lexology newsfeeds. They are a centralized way of getting legal related updates from many jurisdictions and a great way to stay informed with a minimal time commitment."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group