• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

China and Germany sign a new double tax treaty

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

China, Germany March 31 2014

On 28 March 2014, China and Germany signed a new double tax treaty (“Treaty”) that will replace the previous treaty concluded in 1985 (“Old Treaty”). The ratification procedures are still pending, and the Treaty has not yet entered into force.
Similar to the changes in other tax treaties recently renegotiated by China (with, for example, the United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and France), the Treaty makes the following favorable changes for China inbound investment coming from Germany:

Withholding taxes on dividends paid by a Chinese company to a (direct) German parent company or vice versa will be reduced from 10% to 5%.
•
The Chinese royalty withholding tax rate will be reduced from 7% to 6% for specific types of royalties, like the right to use industrial, commercial or scientific equipment.
•
China is permitted as a source state to tax capital gains on the disposal of shares, provided the German (direct or indirect) shareholder owns at least 25% of the shares in the disposed Chinese subsidiary. Nevertheless, the sale of shares in listed companies will be exempt from taxation on Chinese source state capital gains. Under the Old Treaty, there are no exceptions to the taxation of source state capital gains on the disposal of shares.
•
The minimum period to create a construction permanent establishment (“PE”) will be increased from 6 months to 12 months.
•
The resident state will have the exclusive right to tax other income. Under the Old Treaty, China reserves the right to tax other income items if they are sourced in China under Chinese domestic law.
Moreover, similar to the changes in tax treaties renegotiated by China with other nations in recent years, the Treaty also contains a provision that expressly allows the application of domestic anti-avoidance rules and a provision that addresses cross-border assistance in the collection of taxes.
In addition, the Treaty contains a general anti-avoidance rule. The general anti-avoidance rule disallows the Treaty benefits if (i) the main purpose for entering into a certain transaction or arrangement is to secure the Treaty benefits and (ii) granting those benefits would be contrary to the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of the Treaty. To date, the Treaty is only the third tax treaty signed by China to contain a general anti-avoidance rule. The other two treaties with a general anti-avoidance rule are the new China-France treaty signed on 26 November 2013 and the China- Czech treaty signed on 28 August 2009.
The following new additions in the Treaty are also worth noting:
•
The Treaty has a new article that expressly allows China to apply the withholding tax rate provided under its domestic law. The tax withheld in China will be refunded when the taxpayer applies to receive the treaty benefits. This change corresponds to China’s current practice, which only allows a foreign taxpayer to receive a reduced withholding tax rate on dividends, interest or royalties if approved by a PRC tax bureau.
•
In the protocol of the Treaty, China expresses its willingness to refer to the OECD Model Commentary (2008) in interpreting and applying Article 7 of the Treaty. This expression of reliance on the OECD Model Commentary is somewhat unusual because China is not an OECD member. China does not have domestic rules to address

profit attribution to a PE, so it usually taxes the PE of a foreign company on a deemed profit method. It remains to be seen whether the Treaty will have any impact on profit attribution to the PE of a German company in China.
By adopting the same changes found in other recently renegotiated tax treaties, the Treaty provides further evidence of the transition in China’s tax treaty regime towards a uniform withholding tax rate of 5% on cross-border dividends. And the Treaty also shows that China is committed to preventing abuses of tax treaty benefits by identifying and adjusting improper tax arrangements. These trends demonstrate that China favors direct investment from foreign companies with substantial business operations over indirect investment through the use of a special purpose vehicles located in low tax jurisdictions

Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. For more information, please visit: www.bakermckenzie.com/en/client-resource-disclaimer.

Baker McKenzie - Jon Eichelberger, Jinghua Liu, Brendan Thomas Kelly, Glenn DeSouza, William Marshall and Shanwu Yuan

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • China
  • Germany
  • Tax
  • Baker McKenzie

Topics

  • Shareholder
  • Withholding tax

Popular articles from this firm

  1. China: The Clock is Ticking! - Cyberspace Administration of China finalizes measures for security assessment of transfers of data abroad *
  2. At a glance: patent enforcement proceedings in China *
  3. China: Recent developments in the Chinese hydrogen market - Policy and market trends *
  4. COVID-19 Government Intervention Schemes *
  5. At a glance: patent enforcement proceedings in China *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Managing a dawn raid
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to identify and assess bribery and corruption risk (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: Conducting an antitrust audit (USA)

Related research hubs

  • Shareholder
  • China
  • Germany
  • Tax
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research