The Delaware Chancery Court denied a motion to dismiss a shareholder derivative action claiming that the company’s directors breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders by approving stock option grants to the president in excess of amounts permitted under the company’s stock incentive plan and by issuing a materially misleading 2012 proxy statement. The action also asserted claims against the company’s president for breaching his fiduciary duty and for unjust enrichment by accepting the grant. The directors sought to dismiss the claims for demand futility and failure to state a claim. The court denied the motion to dismiss for futility because the grants were a clear violation of the terms of the plan. The motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim was dismissed because the clear violation of the stockholder-approved plan implicates the duty of loyalty and therefore states a viable claim. Pfeiffer v. Leedle, C.A. No. 7831-VCP (Del. Ch. Nov. 8, 2013).
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact email@example.comRegister
Delaware Chancery Court “green lights” claims against directors for approving excessive stock option grants
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Related topic hubs
McDonald Carano Wilson LLP
“I really enjoy Lexology and incorporate into my practice everyday. I find the content very timely and well written. Keep up the good work.”