On January 29, 2009, in the much-anticipated consumer law decision of Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., the California Supreme Court unanimously held that the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) requires a plaintiff to allege that he or she has suffered “some damage” as a result of a purported unlawful practice in order to have standing to sue.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com
RegisterCalifornia Supreme Court limits suits under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
USA
February 3 2009
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.
Looking for a lawyer?
Use our powerful AI search functionality to accurately identify the right lawyer with the relevant experience and expertise to solve your specific legal issues.
Featured Video
Related topic hubs
Paul Neary
Solicitor
CIE Group
What our clients say
"The newsfeeds are very useful to me in the areas in which I practice. The quality of the material is very good and the newsfeeds provide concise overviews of recent developments."