On January 29, 2009, in the much-anticipated consumer law decision of Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., the California Supreme Court unanimously held that the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) requires a plaintiff to allege that he or she has suffered “some damage” as a result of a purported unlawful practice in order to have standing to sue.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com
RegisterCalifornia Supreme Court limits suits under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
USA
February 3 2009
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.
Related topic hubs
Brigitte Zaza
Company Secretary
Chevron Limited
What our clients say
"As Company Secretary, I find these articles very useful and appropriate and also share them with the lawyers and paralegals in the department".
