On January 29, 2009, in the much-anticipated consumer law decision of Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., the California Supreme Court unanimously held that the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) requires a plaintiff to allege that he or she has suffered “some damage” as a result of a purported unlawful practice in order to have standing to sue.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact [email protected]
RegisterCalifornia Supreme Court limits suits under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
USA
February 3 2009
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].
Related research hubs
Robert E. Armstrong
Partner
McDonald Carano Wilson LLP
What our clients say
“I really enjoy Lexology and incorporate into my practice everyday. I find the content very timely and well written. Keep up the good work.”