Last summer, the Government of Romania obliged all beneficiaries of environmental permits to obtain annual endorsements for such permits to keep them valid. This regulation was introduced by Emergency Ordinance.
This April, the Romanian Constitutional Court has declared it as unconstitutional, which has alleviated the concerns of many companies.
On 19th July 2018, the Romanian Government passed Emergency Ordinance 75/2018 (‘GEO 75’), which amended the EO on environmental protection. Among other things, GEO 75 introduced the obligation of beneficiaries of existing environmental permits and integrated environmental permits to obtain an annual endorsement (viză anuală).
In November 2018, the Ministry of Environment approved a procedure to request such an endorsement by means of an Order, which confirmed that permit holders needed an endorsement to certify that the permit conditions were maintained de facto on-site. This request had to be filed with the environmental protection authority at the latest 60 days before the anniversary of the original permit was granted.
If the holder failed to obtain an endorsement, the competent authority could grant a 30-day remedy period, but if this then expired without getting an endorsement, the permit became invalid.
But since environmental permits and integrated authorizations are issued for 5 or 10 years, this new regulation was seen to reduce the validity term of environmental permits de facto, which has been a source of legal uncertainty.
GEO 75 was considered to be in breach of the constitutional provisions by a group of 27 senators, who filed a constitutional complaint on the basis that the Government could not prove the urgency for any of the measures and amendments introduced by GEO 75. So, the senators complained that the Government only wanted to enforce its will by evading parliamentary legal procedure.
On 9th April 2019 the Constitutional Court of Romania declared GEO 75 as unconstitutional in its entirety.
As per the Constitution of Romania, provisions of laws and ordinances found to be unconstitutional cease their validity 45 days after the publication of the Constitutional Court's decision, unless the Parliament or the Government adapts the unconstitutional provisions to those of the Constitution. During this period, the provisions found to be unconstitutional are suspended as an effect of the law.
Therefore, the annual endorsement obligation ceases to apply for the 45-day term after the publication of the decision, i.e. until 18th July 2019.
If the provisions of GEO 75 are not brought into line with the Constitution by that date, then GEO 75 ceases to be valid.
From an investor’s point of view, GEO 75 was hard to understand. Once granted a permit for a certain period, one did not expect renewal obligations to be introduced at a later stage by Emergency Ordinance.
The decision of the Constitutional Court is a relief. We will follow up on any steps taken by the competent authorities.