- Standing: successor bank had standing to foreclose as a result of merger because, by virtue of merger, power to foreclose vested in bank without any further assignment or conveyance required – Horowitz v. CitiMortgage, Inc., No. 13-11383 (11th Cir. Aug. 9, 2013) (affirming district court’s grant of motion to dismiss)
- Non-judicial Foreclosure: foreclosure notices were adequate when they identified contact information of loan servicer and were sent at least 30 days before foreclosure sale, even though (i) they did not identify secured creditor or specific date of sale and were sent by a law firm and (ii) foreclosure sale advertisement was not sent together with foreclosure notices – Carr v. U.S. Bank, NA, No. 1:11-cv-00821-SCJ (11th Cir. Aug. 16, 2013) (affirming summary judgment)
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister
11th Circuit cases (9 &16/08/2013)
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email email@example.com.
Related topic hubs
Vice President, General Counsel and Compliance Officer
The MMIC Group
"I LOVE this resource. Absolutely the best and most reliable single source of what’s going on that affects our business. THANKS!!"