We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login Register
  • Newsfeed
  • GTDT
    • GTDT home
    • Guides
    Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
    GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Learn
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login Register
  • Newsfeed
  • GTDT
    • GTDT home
    • Guides
    Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
    GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Learn
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

MAS issues response to feedback received on proposed amendments to MAS Notice 637 to implement capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties

Allen & Gledhill LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Singapore December 20 2012

On 29 November 2012, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (the "MAS") issued its Response to the consultation paper on "Proposed Amendments to MAS Notice 637 to Implement Capital Requirements for Bank Exposures to Central Counterparties" which was released on 28 September 2012 (the "Consultation Paper").

Allen & Gledhill LLP - Adrian Ang V-Meng, Francis Mok, Karen Tiah and Wong Sook Ping
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Singapore
  • Banking
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP

Tagged with

  • Capital requirement

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Singapore High Court finds post-termination non-competition and non-solicitation covenants void *
  2. Singapore High Court upholds non-compete clause in employment contract of former broker *
  3. Private Banking & Wealth Management in Singapore *
  4. Singapore High Court finds representation made for repayment of money and allows appeal *
  5. Corporate Reorganisations in Singapore *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Powered by Lexology

Featured Video

Thanos Rammos Dr. Jan Phillip Rektorschek
2:01 min

Thanos Rammos, Dr. Jan Phillip Rektorschek

Taylor Wessing

Go AIIP: AI and data processing
Watch now

Related topic hubs

  1. Singapore
  2. Banking

Related Singapore articles

  1. MAS response to feedback from consultation paper on "Proposed Amendments to MAS Notice 637 to Impliement Composition of Capital Disclosure Requirements" *
  2. MAS consulation paper on "Proposed Amendments to MAS Notice 637 to Implement Composition of Capital Disclosure Requirements" *
  3. MAS to implement leverage ratio disclosure requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore from 1 January 2015 *
Paul Neary
Solicitor
CIE Group
What our clients say

"The newsfeeds are very useful to me in the areas in which I practice. The quality of the material is very good and the newsfeeds provide concise overviews of recent developments."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2019 Globe Business Media Group