We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • GTDT
  • Hubs
  • Learn
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Compare
  • Topics
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Insight Reports

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates Coming soon
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Handling changes to job site conditions

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA August 31 2008

Unexpected or "differing" conditions on a construction project can significantly increase costs for owners and contractors.

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Construction
  • Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Tagged with

  • General contractor

Popular articles from this firm

  1. IRS provides long-awaited cryptocurrency guidance *
  2. The SEC marches on - Cryptocurrency startup Block.one pays civil penalty of $24 million over unregistered initial coin offering *
  3. Patronage capital lawsuits against electric cooperatives on the rise *
  4. The California Attorney General’s proposed regulations on the California Consumer Privacy Act - a helpful roadmap on how to comply? *
  5. Patronage capital lawsuits against electric cooperatives on the rise *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Powered by Lexology

Featured Video
1:58 min

Allen & Overy LLP

What brand owners should know about design rights in the UK
Watch now

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Construction

Related USA articles

  1. When the pre-bid information turns out to be wrong *
  2. The art of managing construction risks *
  3. Contract provisions may protect owners during the current economic crisis *

Related international articles

  1. Change orders and notice requirements: mitigating the cumulative impact of multiple changes * - Canada
  2. Collaborative Contracting * - Australia
  3. Bringing power to the people: managing the construction of off-grid power projects * - United Kingdom
Martha van den Beld
Legal Counsel
TOTAL Nederland NV
What our clients say

"Lexology is a high quality service; the articles are very relevant and always useful"

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2019 Law Business Research