We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Handling changes to job site conditions

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA August 31 2008

Unexpected or "differing" conditions on a construction project can significantly increase costs for owners and contractors.

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Construction
  • Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Tagged with

  • General contractor
  • Employment website

Popular articles from this firm

  1. For adults only: A peep at immoral and scandalous marks in the US *
  2. Indiana Enacts IRC Conformity Bill, Decouples from Certain Federal Tax Reform Provisions *
  3. No End in Sight: ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuits Continue Unabated in 2017 *
  4. Mandamus for the rest of us-The Federal Circuit continues its trend of clarifying patent venue post-TC Heartland *
  5. Rod Rosenstein announces DOJ directive to avoid "piling on" of penalties; suggests focus on enforcement against individuals *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Construction

Related USA articles

  1. When the pre-bid information turns out to be wrong *
  2. The art of managing construction risks *
  3. Contract provisions may protect owners during the current economic crisis *

Related international articles

  1. Change orders and notice requirements: mitigating the cumulative impact of multiple changes * - Canada
  2. Collaborative Contracting * - Australia
  3. Bringing power to the people: managing the construction of off-grid power projects * - United Kingdom

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions:Patents

  1. USA
  2. Italy
  3. United Kingdom
  4. View more
Ting Sim
Legal Counsel
Shell Eastern Petroleum
What our clients say

"I would like to thank the SCCA for this excellent service! The articles included in the newsfeeds are very useful and informative, and the user-friendly format of the newsfeeds means I can quickly glance over the précis in the emails to choose what to zoom in on."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group