The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently published its latest Enforcement Annual Performance Report, covering the reporting year ending 31 March 2019. Headlines on these reports often focus on the total value of the fines that are issued. However, those figures are often skewed by significant outliers; for example, this year the total value of fines issued against individuals (£80.2 million) included a fine of £76 million against Stewart Ford (CEO of Keydata). In this note, we assess a range of data from the current and earlier reports in order to understand the FCA's approach to enforcement and how it is changing over time. This will, in turn, help authorised firms (and their boards and senior managers) to decide where to focus their own compliance resources.
As with our similar note last year, we will look at the following questions:
- Is FCA investigation and enforcement activity increasing?
- Where is the FCA focusing its enforcement resources?
- In which areas is the FCA increasing or decreasing its levels of activity?
- How long do enforcement investigations take, and what is their likely outcome?
- What other points of note are there in the FCA report?
Is FCA investigation and enforcement activity increasing?
The FCA's approach to enforcement has changed significantly in recent years, following findings in the Green report that it had previously placed too much emphasis, when deciding whether to investigate, on assessing the likelihood of ultimately winning disciplinary proceedings. In its recently published Approach to Enforcement, the FCA states that it will open an investigation in any case "where we suspect serious misconduct".
Although the FCA also states that it will "investigate efficiently and fairly", concerns in the industry that the current approach leads to resource stretch and delays in resolving investigations are arguably borne out by the data, which shows the number of open investigations increasing substantially but the number of fines issued remaining steady at a historically low level:
Where is the FCA focusing its enforcement resources?
In its report, the FCA has broken down its open investigations by subject matter rather than by industry sector. The main areas of focus over the reporting period were:
As with last year, the area with the most open investigations was market abuse (made up of insider dealing and market manipulation). One quarter of all open investigations related to market abuse in 2018/19. The next largest area for open investigations was retail conduct and lending. This ties in with the recent emphasis the FCA has placed on consumer protection, including its work on high cost credit and its feedback statement on whether to impose a duty of care on firms. Financial crime, and culture and governance, also saw a significant number of open cases.
In which areas is the FCA increasing or decreasing its levels of activity?
All main areas saw increased numbers of investigations, though the degree of increase and longer term trends vary according to the area:
The data indicates that:
- after growing rapidly between 2017 and 2018, the increase in culture and governance cases has slowed down. It is possible that the earlier increase was a response to the introduction and roll-out of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). It will be interesting to see what happens to investigations over the next year with SMCR applying to all FCA regulated firms from 9 December 2019;
- the rapid increase in market abuse cases between 2016 and 2017, which slowed in 2018, appears to have picked up again;
- the number of financial crime and retail conduct investigations has continued to grow. There are now twice as many open retail conduct investigations as in 2016 and more than four times as many open financial crime investigations;
- after decreases in the number of wholesale conduct investigations in both years between 2016 and 2018, the number of investigations appears to have levelled out. The market abuse category will also include wholesale cases.
How long do enforcement investigations take, and what is their likely outcome?
The report outlines the average length of enforcement cases (from the start of an investigation through to its closure), broken down into various categories of outcome. For most types of civil and regulatory cases, the average length has reduced slightly since last year, though it is still relatively high compared to previous years:
The range of sanctions employed by the FCA in investigations resulting in a public outcome reduced in 2017/18. The breakdown is as follows:
This reduction in the variety of sanctions used seems at odds with much of what the FCA has been saying publicly with regards to the tools it wishes to employ. In a recent speech, the FCA's Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight called for increased use of criminal sanctions for breaches of the Money Laundering Regulations. Similarly, the FCA's enforcement approach document makes it clear that the FCA will consider the full range of sanctions at its disposal when taking disciplinary action.
Interestingly, this is the first year in which the FCA's partly contested case procedure was used, but this is not mentioned in the report.
What other points of note are there in the FCA report?
There are a number of other interesting points in the FCA report, particularly where the FCA goes into detail on its priorities in various sectors. The key points we have identified include:
- money laundering, financial crime and suspicious transaction investigations are referred to as priorities in terms of both retail and wholesale conduct, respectively;
- insider dealing (particularly where the insider dealing is systematic) is another area of priority, and the FCA has investigated market manipulation across a range of asset classes;
- the FCA is investigating cases where firms have failed to implement effective systems and controls, including to mitigate financial crime, to ensure accurate transaction reporting and to notify the FCA of suspicious transactions; and
- the FCA highlights its international cooperation, emphasising the investment put in to forge stronger relationships with partners during the reporting period.