Executive Summary: Recently, the US Department of Labor (DOL) announced that it will adhere to a new test for determining whether interns qualify as employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA requires for-profit employers to pay “employees” for their work; however, whether interns or students qualify as “employees,” and, thus, are entitled to compensation for services provided, has been the subject of considerable litigation. In its statement, the DOL abandoned the six-factor test it instituted in 2010, and instead endorsed the “primary beneficiary” test which was established by the Second Circuit in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. Further, the DOL stated that the Wage and Hour Division’s investigators will “holistically analyze internships on a case-by-case basis.” This is a strategic change in the DOL’s enforcement policies to align its procedures with several circuit court decisions.
Prior Six-Factor Test:
The six factors previously used by the DOL to evaluate whether interns, trainees, externs, or similar individuals would be considered employees were:
- The training, even though it included the facilities of the employer, was similar to that which would be given in a vocational school or academic educational institution;
- The training was for the benefit of the intern, trainee, or student;
- The interns, trainees, or students did not displace regular employees, but worked under their close supervision;
- The employer derived no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern, trainee or student and occasionally the employer’s operations were impeded;
- The interns or trainees were not necessarily entitled to a job after the completion of the training period; and
- The employer and interns or trainees understood that the interns or trainees were not entitled to wages for the time spent training.
This test required that all six criteria be satisfied for an individual to be considered an intern. If no employment relationship existed, the provisions of the FLSA did not apply and the intern was not entitled to compensation.
New “Primary Beneficiary” Test:
The newly enacted “primary beneficiary test” allows courts to examine the “economic reality” of the intern-employer relationship. Essentially, the test focuses on whether the intern or the employer derives the primary benefit from their relationship. The Glatt court and several other federal courts have identified the following non-exhaustive seven factors as part of the test for determining whether an individual is an intern or an employee:
- The extent to which the intern and the employer clearly understand that there is no expectation of compensation. Any promise of compensation, express or implied, suggests that the intern is an employee—and vice versa.
- The extent to which the internship provides training that would be similar to that which would be given in an educational environment, including the clinical and other hands-on training provided by educational institutions.
- The extent to which the internship is tied to the intern’s formal education program by integrated coursework or the receipt of academic credit.
- The extent to which the internship accommodates the intern’s academic commitments by corresponding to the academic calendar.
- The extent to which the internship’s duration is limited to the period in which the internship provides the intern with beneficial learning.
- The extent to which the intern’s work complements, rather than displaces, the work of paid employees while providing significant educational benefits to the intern.
- The extent to which the intern and the employer understand that the internship is conducted without entitlement to a paid job at the conclusion of the internship.
In adopting the primary beneficiary test, the DOL indicated that this is meant to be a flexible test with no determinative single factor. Each inquiry will be highly individualized, and if an intern, trainee, or student is found to be an employee, he/she will be entitled to both minimum wage and overtime compensation under the FLSA.
Employers’ Bottom Line:
The new primary beneficiary test adopted by the DOL certainly relaxes the criteria for establishing an unpaid internship under the FLSA and therefore is good news for employers who wish to establish such programs. However, employers should still re-evaluate how they structure and draft the terms of their internship programs to ensure compliance. In doing so, employers should note the flexibility of the primary beneficiary test and ensure internship programs emphasize educational development, while also recognizing that the highly individualized nature of the primary beneficiary test may require a more specific or targeted approach to internships in general.
If you have any questions regarding this Alert, or the changes described, please feel free to contact the authors of this Alert, David Kim, at firstname.lastname@example.org, or Priya Amin, at email@example.com, both in our Berkeley Heights, New Jersey office. You may also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.