We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

The employment law roundup

Rubin Thomlinson LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Canada January 30 2009

A discussion of cases of note in 2008 would not be complete without some consideration of the case of Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, [2008] SCC 39 (S.C.C.) (“Honda”).

Rubin Thomlinson LLP - Janice Rubin and Sharaf Sultan
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • Canada
  • Employment & Labor
  • Litigation
  • Rubin Thomlinson LLP

Tagged with

  • Consideration
  • Honda
  • Honda Canada Inc.
  • The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Workplace Investigation Alert: A botched harassment/bullying complaint in BC *
  2. Top 10 employment law cases of 2012 *
  3. Top 10 employment law cases of 2013 *
  4. Failure to ask employee about questionable expenses prior to termination means no just cause *
  5. Employee’s dishonesty and breach of confidentiality during a workplace investigation leads to cause termination *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. Canada
  2. Litigation
  3. Employment & Labor

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Employment: International

  1. Canada
  2. France
  3. United Kingdom
  4. More...
Brigitte Zaza
Company Secretary
Chevron Limited
What our clients say

"As Company Secretary, I find these articles very useful and appropriate and also share them with the lawyers and paralegals in the department".

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group