We still don’t know. Like the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Andersen v St Jude Medical Inc, 2012 ONSC 3660 (see the BLG Monthly Update for August 2012), the BC Court of Appeal has recently declined to say whether it’s an independent cause of action predicated on wrongdoing (without proof of damages) or a ‘parasitic’ remedial election that depends on the existence of an underlying tort: Koubi v Mazda Canada Inc, 2012 BCCA 310. The BC appeal court did, however, usefully narrow the application of waiver of tort to preclude its use where there is an exhaustive or exclusive legislative scheme to remedy a statutory breach.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact email@example.comRegister
What’s the deal with waiver of tort? (Part 2)
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Related topic hubs
Director and Senior Counsel
“The new ACC Newsstand is one of the best e-resources that I have encountered in 21 years of practicing Employment Law. The information is timely, helpful and easy to navigate. Thank you for offering it and please continue it indefinitely!!”