We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Singapore Patents: Closure of Foreign Route from 1 Jan 2020

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Singapore September 5 2016

The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore ("IPOS") recently announced that the "foreign route" for obtaining the grant of a Singapore patent will be abolished with effect from 1 January, 2020. The following types of applications will be affected: (a) patent applications with a date of filing on or after 1 January 2020; and (b) divisional applications with a lodgment date on or after 1 January 2020 (regardless of the date of filing). With the closure of the "foreign route", all affected Singapore patent applications will have to undergo local substantive examination. Current Procedure for Grant There are currently three routes for the grant of a Singapore patent application: (a) Local Route: where a request for local substantive search and examination is filed; (b) Mixed Route: where a request for local substantive examination is made based on the search results of a prescribed foreign patent office or international authority under the PCT; or (c) Foreign Route: where the substantive search and examination results of a prescribed foreign patent office or international authority under the PCT is relied upon for grant. Both the local and mixed routes are unaffected by the changes announced. Under the foreign route, IPOS only undertakes a "supplementary examination" which checks for issues such as claim relatedness between the claims submitted for grant and those allowed/granted by the prescribed office/authority, whether the submitted claims are supported by the specification, and double patenting. There is no substantive examination of patentability requirements such as novelty and inventive step. Once the application clears the supplementary examination, the application will proceed to grant upon payment of the requisite grant fees. The foreign route is therefore a quick and cost efficient option for applicants who have filed a corresponding foreign or PCT application with a prescribed patent office/international authority, and obtained grant or a positive examination report on such an application. However, since substantive examination is conducted by a number of different patent offices with varying examination guidelines and practices, the foreign route suffers from a lack of consistency in examination standards and quality. IPOS hopes to address this issue with the closure of the foreign route. 2 IP Client Alert Suggested Actions Details of the changes have not been announced as they have not been enacted into legislation. Nevertheless, applicants who wish to take advantage of the benefits offered by the foreign route should take steps to ensure that their Singapore applications (including divisional applications) are filed before 1 Jan 2020. ©2016. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow is a member of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “partner” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Baker McKenzie - Angeline Lee and Abe Sun
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • Singapore
  • Intellectual Property
  • Baker McKenzie

Tagged with

  • Article (grammar)

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training Comes To New York *
  2. Take A Break To Remember Your Meal And Rest Period Obligations Under California Law *
  3. New obligation for Spanish companies to disclose their ultimate beneficial owners *
  4. Russia Proposes Harsh New Counter-Sanctions *
  5. The Crypto Valleys: The Regulatory Battle to Become the Global Hub of ICOs *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. Singapore
  2. Intellectual Property

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Patents

  1. Singapore
  2. Romania
  3. Ukraine
  4. More...
Audrey E Mross
Labor & Employment Attorney
Munck Carter LLP
What our clients say

“The Lexology newsfeed is very relevant to my practice and I like that you can tailor the newsfeed to include specific practice areas. I enjoy seeing a variety of approaches and I will read multiple articles on the same topic for the purpose of getting the fullest understanding of a new law, a court case or other legal development.”

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group