On  January  19,  2015,  the  PRC  Ministry  of  Commerce  (“MOFCOM”) released a draft Foreign Investment Law (the “Draft Law”) for public comments. If adopted, the  Draft Law will revolutionize the regime for foreign investment in China and have a profound impact  on both existing investments and future transactions. We set out below some of the main changes to  China’s foreign investment regime proposed by the Draft Law.

New Foreign Investment Regime

Currently, foreign investors need to obtain prior approval from MOFCOM (or its local counterparts)  in order to invest in China. Under the Draft Law, these approvals are only required for investments  in industries on a negative list in a “restriction catalogue” (“Restricted Industries”), while  industries on a “prohibition catalogue” will remain closed to foreign investors. In all other  industries, the initial foreign investment will be subject to the same regime as domestic  investment, i.e., registration obligations under the PRC Company Law, and industry specific  licensing regimes where applicable.

The Draft Law also creates a new reporting regime. A foreign investment must be reported within 30  days after it is made. Major changes to a foreign-invested enterprise (“FIE”) must also be reported  within 30 days after they occur. In addition, an annual filing (or a quarterly filing for large  FIEs) is required.

The Draft Law removes the distinction in corporate form between foreign and domestic invested  corporate entities. The Draft Law grandfathers existing FIEs to continue to operate under their  prior approvals, but these existing FIEs will have three years after adoption of the Draft Law to  transition  from  their  existing  corporate  form  into  a  corporation  or partnership under relevant PRC regulations.

Legal Status of VIE Structures Clarified

Currently, PRC law is unclear about the legal status of VIE structures commonly adopted by many  listed companies, such as Alibaba and Sina, and MOFCOM has not accepted anti-monopoly filing  applications for combinations involving VIE structures. The good news is that the Draft Law  acknowledges the legal status of VIE structures. Presumably, after the Draft Law is adopted, MOFCOM  would allow combinations involving VIE structures (assuming that such combinations pass the  anti-monopoly review).

The Draft Law clarifies that for future investments in VIE structures, so long as the VIE structure  will be controlled by foreign investors after the investment, MOFCOM will treat such investments as  foreign investment. If the investor can provide satisfactory evidence to MOFCOM showing that the  VIE structure will be controlled by Chinese investors after the investment, MOFCOM will treat such  investments as domestic investments. MOFCOM will look at the investor with ultimate control rather  than the type of entity used for the investment in determining whether an investment is foreign or  domestic.

The Draft Law only contains a placeholder for how existing VIE structures will be handled and  MOFCOM is seeking comments from the general public on this issue. MOFCOM raises three possible  approaches in its explanations to the Draft Law, being:

  1. Existing VIE structures where Chinese investors are in control can continue to operate under  the same structure if the domestic entity under contractual control (the “VIE Entity”) makes a  filing with MOFCOM regarding their Chinese investor-controlled status; or
  2. Existing VIE structures where Chinese investors are in control can continue to operate under  the same structure if the VIE Entity applies to MOFCOM for acknowledgment of its Chinese  investor-controlled status and MOFCOM acknowledges this status; or
  3. Existing VIE Entities should apply to MOFCOM for foreign investment approval and MOFCOM  (working together with other relevant governmental authorities) will determine whether to grant  such approval based on a variety of factors, including whether the VIE structure is controlled by  Chinese investors.

The above approaches suggest that MOFCOM should permit a VIE structure to continue to operate under  the same structure after the Draft Law is adopted, so long as the FIE which controls the VIE Entity  is ultimately controlled by Chinese investors even if the VIE structure operates in a Restricted  Industry.

Who has “control” is the key to determining which VIE structures operating in Restricted Industries  can continue to operate under the same structure after the Draft Law is adopted. Under the Draft  Law, “control” exists where any of the following tests is met: (a) at least 50% equity ownership;  (b) the right or actual ability to nominate at least half of the directors; (c) the holding of  voting rights sufficient to exercise major influence over shareholders’ or directors’ decisions; or  (d) decisive influence over operations, finances, human resources or technology through contract,  trust or other arrangements.   However, the current definition of control raises 

some questions.  For example, what if Chinese and foreign investors both satisfy the control  definition?  What if a founder of a VIE structure has de facto control over the business but only holds a small  minority interest in the foreign parent entity controlling the VIE structure and does not have  special board appointment rights? Furthermore, if MOFCOM determines that an existing VIE structure  operating in a Restricted Industry is not controlled by Chinese investors, will MOFCOM impose  conditions or insist on changing the structure? These are all questions that need to be clarified.

National Security Review Can be Triggered by All Foreign Investments

Since 2011, foreign acquisitions in specified industries can be reviewed for national security  concerns under a circular issued by the PRC State Council (the “Security Review Circular”). The  Draft Law not only incorporates this review into a formal statute, but also broadens its scope and  increases its impact. Under the Draft Law, a national security review can be triggered by any form  of foreign investment (not only by acquisitions) and in any industry. The list of security concerns  to be taken into account in the review has also been expanded, enhancing the list that is within  the current Security Review Circular.

As is the case under the Security Review Circular, under the Draft Law, foreign investors may apply  for national security review on their own initiative. The Draft Law would also allow any interested  party (government departments, industry associations, competitors or upstream and downstream  businesses in the relevant industry, etc.) to request MOFCOM to conduct a security review.

In addition to the above, when applying for approval to invest in a Restricted Industry, the  foreign investor is required to explain whether the investment should be subject to national  security review. This requirement puts the burden on the foreign investor to make an initial  national security assessment and encourages the foreign investor to apply for national security  review prior to making the investment. If the foreign investor elects not to apply for national  security review, the investment can potentially be challenged by other PRC governmental authorities  and other interested parties after the investment has been completed.


On the whole, the Draft Law attempts to simplify and reduce uncertainty relating to foreign  investment in China by streamlining the approval process, granting national treatment where  possible and clarifying the legal status of VIE structures. However, the Draft Law, in its current  form, also raises new issues that need to be clarified in order to avoid unintentional consequences  for foreign and domestic investors investing in China. Clients should review their current  investment projects in light of the impending change in law. Some transactions should be  accelerated and completed before they are impacted by the Draft Law coming into effect. Other transactions may be facilitated or enabled by the new framework.