We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Federal court dismisses franchisee's case and compels arbitration

Gray Plant Mooty
MEMBER FIRM OF Multilaw

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA June 14 2012

In Senior Services of Palm Beach, LLC v. ABCSP Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79038 (S.D. Fla. June 7, 2012), a Florida federal court dismissed the case brought by Senior Services of Palm Beach agaisnt ABCSP., franchisor of home health care businesses, and granted ABCSP's motion to compel arbitration in California.

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Arbitration & ADR
  • Franchising
  • Litigation
  • Gray Plant Mooty

Tagged with

  • Florida

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Franchising in the USA *
  2. Should we ever make a loan to a borrower who may die? *
  3. Unsigned contract does not create binding commitment to distributor *
  4. Internet banking - is your bank protected against liability for unauthorized ACH transfers? *
  5. Franchise Agreement’s Post-Term Noncompete Withstands Franchisee’s Motion To Dismiss In Colorado District Court *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Franchising
  3. Arbitration & ADR

Related USA articles

  1. Court compels arbitration, calling unconscionability an issue for the arbitrator *
  2. District court holds that the question of unconscionability of an arbitration clause is to be determined by the arbitrator *
  3. Florida federal court stays litigation pending franchisor's motion to compel arbitration *

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions:Arbitration

  1. USA
  2. France
  3. Norway
  4. View more
Jason T Weintraub
Director, Legal
Taco Bell
What our clients say

 “Let me add some more positive feedback. I love the newsstand!”

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group