• Login
  • Register
  • PRO
    • PRO Compliance plan
    • PRO Compliance
    • PRO subscription plans
    • Curated articles
    • In-depth
    • Market intelligence
    • Practice guides
    • PRO Reports New
    • Lexology GTDT
    • Ask Lexy
  • PRO
  • Latest
  • GTDT
  • Research
  • Learn
  • Experts
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Explore
  • Legal Research
  • Primary SourcesBeta
  • PRO Compliance

Introducing PRO Compliance
The essential resource for in-house professionals

  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre New

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates New

Lexology PRO

Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 

PRO Compliance plan
PRO subscription plans

Premium content

  • Curated articles
  • In-depth
  • Market intelligence
  • Practice guides
  • PRO Reports New

Analysis tools

  • Lexology GTDT
  • Ask Lexy
Explore all PRO content PRO Compliance
  • Find experts
  • About
  • Firms
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

U.S. Commerce Department issues proposed rule to implement executive order on telecom supply chain

Hogan Lovells

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA November 27 2019

On 26 November 2019 the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a long-awaited proposed rule (or draft regulations) to implement Executive Order 13873, "Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain," which was signed on 15 May 2019. The proposed rule gives the secretary of commerce broad authority to review, mitigate, or prohibit many transactions that involve information and communications technology and services (ICTS) once there is designation of a "foreign adversary" under the executive order. The proposed rule also establishes a process for the review, mitigation, and prohibition of relevant transactions and gives the secretary of commerce extremely broad authority to determine which foreign states, entities, or persons are "foreign adversaries." The Commerce Department is seeking public comment until Friday, 27 December 2019.

The proposed rule is also significant for what it does not directly address. Despite speculation that it would identify particular foreign states or entities, the proposed rule – on its face – takes a more neutral approach. The rule does not identify any specific foreign states, entities, or persons as a "foreign adversary." In terms of timing, the executive order gave the Commerce Department 150 days from 15 May 2019 to release an implementing rule.

The Commerce Department did not meet the 12 October 2019 deadline, perhaps out of deference to the ongoing U.S.-China trade negotiations. During the intervening time, there had been speculation that Chinese telecommunications companies, in particular, could be identified by the rule. Finally, the proposed rule comes at a time when U.S. government agencies are increasingly concerned about the national security risks posed by foreign interference with information and communications technology and services in the United States. For instance, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted unanimously on 22 November 2019 to prospectively block U.S. telecommunications companies from using federal funds to purchase equipment from two named Chinese companies. The agency grounded its decisions in national security concerns.

Executive Order 13873: Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain 

As set forth in the executive order, the Trump administration's objective is to reinforce and secure U.S. national security, foreign policy, and the economy against threats from vulnerabilities in the ICTS supply chains. To do so, the executive order gave broad authority to the secretary of commerce. Specifically, the secretary of commerce has the authority to review, mitigate, and prohibit transactions that represent an "undue" or "unacceptable" national security risk and involve "information and communications technology or services" that are associated with a "foreign adversary."

Certain key terms are defined in the executive order and copied in the draft regulations. "Foreign adversary" is defined as "any foreign government or foreign non-government person engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the United States or security and safety of United States persons." However, the executive order did not designate any foreign adversaries.

In order to assist the secretary of commerce with determining threats to the United States posed by foreign adversary interference in the ICTS supply chains, the executive order requires the director of national intelligence and the secretary of homeland security to provide written threat assessments. The secretary of commerce will use these assessments to guide his evaluation of transactions.

"Information and communications technology or services" is defined as "any hardware, software, or other product or service primarily intended to fulfill or enable the function of information or data processing, storage, retrieval, or communication by electronic means, including transmission, storage, and display."

In other words, the terms of the executive order are meant to capture nearly all ICTS transactions involving any foreign states, entities, or persons that the secretary of commerce deems to be a threat to U.S. interests when the transaction involves a U.S. person or property within the U.S. jurisdiction.

The proposed rule The proposed rule implements "the process and procedures that the secretary of commerce will use to identify, assess, and address certain information and communications technology transactions that pose an undue risk to critical infrastructure or the digital economy in the United States, or an unacceptable risk to U.S. national security or the safety of United States persons." The terms, "undue risk" and "unacceptable risk," are left undefined.

The proposed rule primarily does two things: first, it gives broad authority to the secretary of commerce to determine which foreign states, entities, or persons are "foreign adversaries." Second, it provides a process for the secretary's review and prohibition of transactions falling within the scope of the executive order.

The secretary of commerce, in consultation with other heads of executive departments (including the chairman of the FCC), has the authority to determine which foreign states, entities, or persons are "foreign adversaries." The definition of "foreign adversary" mirrors that in the executive order. Notably, the proposed rule does not specify any such "foreign adversaries." Additionally, the draft regulations do not provide additional clarity on the factors the secretary of commerce will use to determine who is a "foreign adversary"; in fact, it notes that it "is a matter of executive branch discretion."

The draft regulations would effectively codify the secretary of commerce's sweeping authority to prohibit a wide swath of covered transactions. As a practical matter, the secretary will use "a caseby-case, fact-specific approach to determine" which transactions fall within the scope of the executive order and the proposed rule. Further, the proposed rule adopts the executive order's criteria for which transactions are subject to review and possible mitigation or prohibition. It also provides for the process by which the secretary will commence and conduct an evaluation. Finally, it requires a written determination from the secretary of commerce.

The key elements of the proposed rule are as follows:

 

Hogan Lovells - Beth Peters, Anthony V. Capobianco, Aleksandar Dukic, Ari Q. Fitzgerald, Ajay Kuntamukkala, Stephen F. Propst, Adam Berry, Ari Fridman, Jane Chen and Karen O’Neill Ocasio
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • IT & Data Protection
  • Public
  • Telecoms
  • Hogan Lovells

Tagged with

  • US Department of Commerce
  • FCC
  • Digital economy

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
loading...

Related topic hubs

  1. Digital economy
  2. USA
  3. Telecoms
  4. IT & Data Protection

Related USA articles

  1. Commerce Issues Proposed Rules on Information and Communications Technology Supply Chain with Broad Impact: December 27 Deadline to Comment *
  2. US Commerce Department Proposes Sweeping New Rules for National Security Review of US Information and Communications Technology or Services Transactions *
  3. Proposed ICTS Supply Chain Review Regime Raises Procedural Concerns *
Greg Jacobson
Governance & Legal Coordinator
Perth Airport
What our clients say

"Lexology is an excellent and extremely useful initiative. Its certainly more useful than some of the paid services that I have signed up to."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research