The Ohio Supreme Court, in a 5-2 decision, has ruled that R.C. 9.481 is constitutional and, therefore, municipalities may not require their employees to reside in a particular municipality, other than as provided in R.C. 9.481(B)(2)(b) (which provides a limited exception permitting political subdivisions to pass laws requiring employees to live within the county or an adjacent county). The full text of the slip opinion is available in PDF form. Proponents of municipal home rule should especially take note of the observations by Chief Justice Moyer in his dissenting opinion.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister
Ohio Supreme Court renders decision on municipal employee residency requirements
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email email@example.com.
Related topic hubs
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
"I am a regular reader of Lexology, as are a few of my colleagues. I find the email newsfeed useful and of good quality, and in some cases directly on point with issues of concern to the company. It is important to stay current with legal developments, and the articles are a great aid toward this goal. The ability to access the articles without cost is critical and I hope Lexology continues with the good work."