We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login Register
  • Newsfeed
  • GTDT
    • GTDT home
    • Guides
    Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
    GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Learn
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login Register
  • Newsfeed
  • GTDT
    • GTDT home
    • Guides
    Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
    GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Learn
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Court reverses $1.4 million ‘spanking’ verdict due to flawed jury instructions

Ogletree Deakins

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA January 31 2008

A state appellate court in California recently reversed a $1.4 million jury verdict in favor of an employee who claimed that she and others were spanked during company sales meetings.

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Employment & Labor
  • Litigation
  • Ogletree Deakins

Popular articles from this firm

  1. California Pay Equity Data Collection Legislation Closer to Passing *
  2. Employers Beware: New Jersey Enacts One of the Toughest “Wage Theft” Laws in the Country *
  3. Illinois Governor Signs Changes to State Equal Pay Act Including Salary History Ban *
  4. New York’s New Employment Discrimination Laws Are Here *
  5. Minneapolis Wage Theft Ordinance to Go Into Effect on January 1, 2020 *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Powered by Lexology

Featured Video

Chris McLeod
3:28 min

Chris McLeod

Elkington + Fife LLP

How trademark practice has evolved in recent years
Watch now

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Employment & Labor
  3. Litigation

Related USA articles

  1. Jury verdict in spanking case reversed *
  2. Sexual harassment does not have to be based upon sexual desire or sexual intent *
  3. May 2016 California Employment Law Notes *

Related international articles

  1. Sexual harassment: what constitutes sexual conduct? * - Australia
  2. Wal-Mart ordered to pay over 1 million in damages * - Canada
Robert E. Armstrong
Partner
McDonald Carano Wilson LLP
What our clients say

“I really enjoy Lexology and incorporate into my practice everyday. I find the content very timely and well written. Keep up the good work.”

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2019 Globe Business Media Group